Teams

Laurel Oak Rosenberg

2022 Sarasota Combo 50 & Over Fall Weekday · 7.5 M Wednesday Eve

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-12-06vs Sarasota/RisquezWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Rosenberg / Dave Barcomb vs Gustavo Risquez / Marc Solomon7-5, 7-6
2022-11-02vs GT Bray ProulxLost 01
L#3 DoublesDave Barcomb / Mike Beasley vs Richard Arndt / Robert Schwartz3-6, 6-7
2022-10-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Rosenberg / Dave Barcomb vs Andrew Phillips / Conrad Penner6-2, 6-1
2022-10-05vs Sarasota/RisquezWon 10
W#3 DoublesDave Barcomb / Mike Brielmaier vs Kevin McNary / Robin Klein6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 M Wednesday Eve have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Dave Barcomb
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
David Rosenberg
published 4
3.38
Bradley Sutter
published 3.5
3.36
Robert Weiss
published
Kenneth Schwartz
published
Mike Beasley
published
Mike Brielmaier
published
Tim Mihm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Schwartz + Bradley Sutter4250% gamesnot enough data
Dave Barcomb + David Rosenberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dave Barcomb
54W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
David Rosenberg
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Bradley Sutter
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Robert Weiss
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
Kenneth Schwartz
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Beasley
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Brielmaier
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Mihm
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.