← Teams

GFU-Tracy

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Nick Hooker
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.54
Paul OHollaren
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Jason Hyde
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
—
Greg Culver
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Troy Johnston
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Mark Beilstein
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.07
Robert Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.82
Erik Bucher
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-06-12Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJason Hyde / Nick Hooker vs Rolf Ellingsen / John Hapke6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Paul OHollaren vs Jon Peters / Kimbal Logan6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDan Tracy / Greg Culver vs Timothy Johnson / David Smiley6-2, 6-1
2022-06-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDan Tracy / Nick Hooker vs Peter Johnson / Austin Rice-Stitt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJason Hyde vs Kevin Shoop6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Mark Beilstein vs Manuel Garcia-Fernandez / William Allers6-1, 6-3
2022-06-05Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesErik Bucher / Paul OHollaren vs JOHN KNOX / Zachary Wright2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNick Hooker vs Michael Genovese0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Mark Beilstein vs Ernesto Bruce / Jeff Cronn6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDan Tracy / Greg Culver vs Jeffrey Bayless / Chip Burczak7-5, 7-5
2022-05-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesRobert Glenn / Nick Hooker vs Matt Savage / Ramon Tuason6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDan Tracy / Jason Hyde vs Charles Stewart / Stephen Crook6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaul OHollaren / Mark Beilstein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-01Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesDan Tracy / Nick Hooker vs Michael Jansen / Murray Jansen6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJason Hyde vs Edmund Yuan7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEric Anderson / Greg Culver vs Ryo Kaneko / David Williams6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErik Bucher / Robert Glenn vs Kiran Manda / Devin McMasters6-1, 6-3
2022-04-30Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesGreg Culver / Nick Hooker vs Dan Boren / Keith Briggs6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesTroy Johnston vs Keith Main6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJason Hyde / Eric Anderson vs Levi Carpio / Richard Gronostajski7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRobert Glenn / Erik Bucher vs Dale Christensen / Doug Christensen6-3, 6-3
2022-04-24Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesDan Tracy / Nick Hooker vs Ryan Manwiller / Keith Main6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTroy Johnston vs Levi Carpio6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJason Hyde / Eric Anderson vs Keith Briggs / Dan Boren6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMark Beilstein / Erik Bucher vs Gerry Nuthmann / Dale Christensen6-1, 6-4
2022-04-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJason Hyde / Greg Culver vs Rolf Ellingsen / John Hapke6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTroy Johnston vs Timothy Johnson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Glenn / Nick Hooker vs David Smiley / Mark Muckerheide6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nick Hooker
194W–65L career
0%98%2%
3.82
3.5
Paul OHollaren
61W–25L career
0%70%30%
3.54
3.5
Jason Hyde
53W–41L career
0%98%2%
3.32
3.5
Greg Culver
51W–25L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Troy Johnston
55W–40L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Mark Beilstein
56W–38L career
13%87%0%
3.09
3.5
Robert Glenn
117W–113L career
14%86%0%
3.07
3
Erik Bucher
79W–60L career
0%98%1%
2.82

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.