Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Raymundo-Arcadia

2021 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesSandra Zane / Rebecca Berman vs Emily Taylor / Rumduol Vuong4-6, 4-6
2021-05-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandra Zane / Rebecca Berman vs Bianca Li / Patricia Martinez6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2021-05-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesSandra Zane / Rebecca Berman vs Karalynn Ngo / Alice Buczek6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesSandra Zane / Rebecca Berman vs Ali Laventhol / Andrea Tieng5-7, 5-7
2021-03-27Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRowena Kousakis / Sandra Zane vs Met Chau / Lena Loha2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Nancy Ray
published
3.27
Leslie Jiang
published
3.26
Diane Quan
published 3.5
3.25
Rebecca Berman
published
3.15
Tammy Hung
published
3.04
Sandra Zane
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
ANALILY PARK
published 3
Ronalyn Raymundo
published
Rowena Kousakis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Jiang + Sandra Zane2446% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Ray
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%56%44%
3.48
Leslie Jiang
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Diane Quan
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26
Rebecca Berman
10W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.25
Tammy Hung
3W–12L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Sandra Zane
146W–141L career · 5 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
ANALILY PARK
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ronalyn Raymundo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rowena Kousakis
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.