Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AM3.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Qing Feng
published
3.06
Alejandro Acero
published 3.5
3.05
Chen Wang
published 3
3.00
Michael McGrain
published
2.90
Antonio Diaz
published 3
2.90
Ming-Da Tsai
published
2.88
Michael Afendakis
published
2.82
Bruce Walicek
published 3
2.78
Pulin Thakkar
published
2.77
Sal Brogna
published
Anthony Guin
published 3
2.73
Peter Zawilski
published
2.72
Eric Griesshaber
published
2.67
Nickhil Bhave
published
2.58
Vladimir Milutin
published
Niket Agarwal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pulin Thakkar + Michael Afendakis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Qing Feng
29W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Alejandro Acero
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Chen Wang
30W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%36%64%
3.05
Michael McGrain
5W–16L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.00
3
Antonio Diaz
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Ming-Da Tsai
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Michael Afendakis
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Bruce Walicek
10W–20L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Pulin Thakkar
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.78
Sal Brogna
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Anthony Guin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Zawilski
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Eric Griesshaber
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Nickhil Bhave
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
2.67
Vladimir Milutin
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
Niket Agarwal
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.