Teams

Sardis-Pinkerton

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-02vs Alberta Banks-CangelosiLost 01
L#2 DoublesCathy Mc Kinnon / MaryJane Bowler vs Sue Mayer / Lori Imhof2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 25 NEGTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Brandy Bailey
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
TAMARA MAELLARO
published
3.31
MaryJane Bowler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Joy Carr
published
Cathy Mc Kinnon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
DeAnna Emborski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Alice Beach
published 3.5
3.13
Cheryl Dorfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Stephanie Figueroa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Patty Bettencourt
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Amy Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Mary Bell
published
3.01
Elcira Pinkerton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Pamela McBride
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Jan Hunter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brandy Bailey + TAMARA MAELLARO10654% games+1.9% vs expected
Joy Carr + TAMARA MAELLARO2541% games−7.8% vs expected
Jan Hunter + Alice Beach0537% gamesnot enough data
Amy Turner + Elcira Pinkerton314 matchesnot enough data
Elcira Pinkerton + DeAnna Emborski314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandy Bailey
30W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.56
TAMARA MAELLARO
25W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
MaryJane Bowler
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.31
Joy Carr
11W–24L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Cathy Mc Kinnon
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
DeAnna Emborski
24W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Alice Beach
17W–28L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Cheryl Dorfeld
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Figueroa
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Patty Bettencourt
46W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3.5
Amy Turner
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Mary Bell
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Elcira Pinkerton
20W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Pamela McBride
29W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.84
Jan Hunter
0W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.