Teams

Meyers-KEELEY

2022 One Doubles · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Gina Ossanna
published 3.5
3.07
Elizabeth Schwarz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joy Meyers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-08-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoy Meyers / Elizabeth Schwarz vs Andrea Lamprecht / Tove Maloco7-5, 6-4
2022-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesKEELEY PLOMBON / Joy Meyers vs Colleen Walker / Michelle Zawadzki7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKEELEY PLOMBON / Joy Meyers vs Lyudmila Leissler / Lia Irvin6-2, 6-3
2022-08-11Won 10
W#1 DoublesKEELEY PLOMBON / Joy Meyers vs Amy Ouellette / Miriam Habafy7-5, 6-1
2022-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoy Meyers / KEELEY PLOMBON vs Thu Truong / Kieu Lam6-3, 6-2
2022-08-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKEELEY PLOMBON / Joy Meyers vs Christie Herkert / Kaie Wellman3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKEELEY PLOMBON / Joy Meyers vs Lyudmila Leissler / Lia Irvin6-2, 6-4
2022-07-24Won 10
W#1 DoublesKEELEY PLOMBON / Joy Meyers vs Ariana White / Tina Farrelly4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Gina Ossanna
33W–61L career
0%92%7%
3.37
3.5
Elizabeth Schwarz
49W–46L career
17%83%0%
3.07
3
Joy Meyers
46W–50L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.