Teams

MDriscoll/RHartley (Lifetime)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-09vs JClarke (Matthews)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRod Hartley / Hans Nelissen vs Andrew Schulz / Peter Baker6-3, 7-6
2024-05-02Won 10
W#3 DoublesPeter Barclay / Michael Powers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-23vs MWaleski (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPeter Barclay / Tim Melton vs Eric Tan / Rod Spence4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRod Hartley / Gary Johnson vs Michael Waleski / Frank Martin5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-18vs MGriffey (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesGary Johnson / Rod Hartley vs Kevin Conway / Mark Brandon7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPeter Barclay / Michael Powers vs Kevin Miller / Robert Major7-5, 7-6
2024-04-04vs DNunn/NBragg (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Barclay / Tim Melton vs Daniel Nunn / Patrick Nitsche2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-03-21vs SHenkel (Blakeney)Split 11
W#2 DoublesRod Hartley / Tim Melton vs Scott Gallegos / Mark Utyesonich6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Powers / Peter Barclay vs Jose Villafana / Kartik Mahalingam3-6, 4-6
2024-03-14vs DJones (Raintree)Won 20
W#2 DoublesRod Hartley / Tim Melton vs Randall Maddle / Howie Webb7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Barclay / Michael Powers vs Christopher Sullivan / Chris Estridge6-2, 6-4
2024-03-07vs BSmith (Park Road)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRod Hartley / Gary Johnson vs Avin Dwivedy / David Saye1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Daniel Latzke
published 4.5
4.05
Rod Hartley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Hans Nelissen
published
4.02
Peter Barclay
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.98
Russell Williams
published
3.96
Scott Carlton
published
3.72
Tim Melton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Barclay + Russell Williams314 matchesnot enough data
Rod Hartley + Hans Nelissen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Latzke
8W–2L career · type D · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Rod Hartley
71W–66L career · 6 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Hans Nelissen
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
4.5
Peter Barclay
22W–49L career · 6 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
4.02
Russell Williams
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.98
Scott Carlton
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.96
Tim Melton
27W–13L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.72

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.