Teams

Radillo (Ron Ehmann)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.5 Adult Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.45 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Michele Drucker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.27
Janine Burke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Barbara Viscito
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.16
Bianca Alvarez
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.12
Carin Blanchard
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.11
Maria Mustelier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Steffi Kordy
published
4.09
Gricel Boto Bernales
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 4.5
4.06
Maria Hulett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.01
3.97
Miriam Radillo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Marcela Schwartz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.76
Lesley Harrington
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Gianna Francis
published
Nicole Cinquino
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carin Blanchard + Michele Drucker6263% games+14.2% vs expected
Gricel Boto Bernales + Bianca Alvarez5554% games+7.4% vs expected
Carin Blanchard + Janine Burke71052% games+5.7% vs expected
Bianca Alvarez + Michele Drucker4452% games+4.3% vs expected
Carin Blanchard + Maria Hulett684456% games+1.6% vs expected
Barbara Viscito + Michele Drucker3355% games+0.5% vs expected
Miriam Radillo + Bianca Alvarez7851% games−1.5% vs expected
Janine Burke + Michele Drucker8554% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Drucker
94W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Janine Burke
266W–184L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Barbara Viscito
105W–116L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Bianca Alvarez
181W–133L career · 11 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Carin Blanchard
206W–149L career · 8 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
4.12
Maria Mustelier
47W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Steffi Kordy
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Gricel Boto Bernales
343W–259L career · 8 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Maria Hulett
182W–138L career · 8 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Alison McLaughlin
37W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
4.01
4.5
Miriam Radillo
87W–84L career · 4 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Marcela Schwartz
39W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.96
Lesley Harrington
42W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Gianna Francis
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Cinquino
35W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.