Teams

Yoo - Manor 3.0

2024 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-12-16vs Brown-Congressional 3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesGrace Coleman / Heather Tinsley vs Carolyn Ruyak / Skye Replogle1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarcella Altieri / Kathryn Lloyd vs Chais Ondeck / Stephanie van Pelt3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Lou Goehrung / Laura Davis vs Alison Wager / Emily Warke3-6, 4-6
2024-12-03vs Brown-Congressional 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Lou Goehrung / Heather Tinsley vs Alison Wager / Renata Raeder2-6, 2-6
2024-11-05vs Brown-Congressional 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGrace Coleman / Laura Davis vs Vanessa Cornoni / Kathryn Powell4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Tinsley / Kathryn Lloyd vs Stephanie van Pelt / Samantha Brown3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Lou Goehrung / Marie Kushlis vs Ann Kane / Renata Raeder6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Heather Tinsley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Laura Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Julie Georgelakos
published
2.37
Mary Lou Goehrung
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathryn Lloyd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marcella Altieri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marie Kushlis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marilyn Mess
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marilyn Mess + Mary Lou Goehrung033 matchesnot enough data
Laura Davis + Mary Lou Goehrung033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Heather Tinsley
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Davis
5W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
Julie Georgelakos
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.50
Mary Lou Goehrung
3W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.37
Kathryn Lloyd
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcella Altieri
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marie Kushlis
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marilyn Mess
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.