Teams

CCW ARGOS

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-19vs CSRC MCPHERSONSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLee Wolfe / Daniel Michon vs James Blackmon / Ben Lowe7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDavid Illsley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-15vs MEMPK TREVISOWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Whipple / Daniel Michon vs Craig Rogers / Michael Bagwell6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDavid Illsley vs Jon Bayne6-3, 6-3
2023-07-12Won 20
W#1 SinglesDavid Illsley vs Justin Holman4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLee Wolfe / Daniel Michon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-06-28vs CSRC WHITELost 02
L#1 SinglesDavid Illsley vs Jon Dickey2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErik Drake / Daniel Michon vs Mark Hutter / Jeffrey White1-6, 0-6
2023-06-21vs LTFCS CORDASCOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesWayne Mo vs Josh Swenson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErik Drake / Daniel Michon vs Boyen Malillos / John Cordasco6-2, 7-5
2023-06-14vs PBCP BRICENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesDavid Illsley vs Michael Fipps6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Mailloux / Daniel Michon vs Craig Lytle / Joe Alvarez6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
David Illsley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.84
Daniel Michon
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Lee Wolfe
published 4
David StClair
published 4
3.73
John Whipple
published
3.71
Wayne Mo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.58
Erik Drake
published
3.49
Jeff Mailloux
published
2.60
Kerwin Swenson
published
George Argos
published
Leon Goorabian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Mailloux + Erik Drake1450% games−0.4% vs expected
Daniel Michon + Wayne Mo6065% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Michon + Jeff Mailloux134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Illsley
101W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Daniel Michon
98W–79L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Lee Wolfe
42W–20L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
David StClair
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Whipple
25W–19L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Wayne Mo
45W–40L career · 1 line in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Erik Drake
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Jeff Mailloux
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Kerwin Swenson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.60
George Argos
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leon Goorabian
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.