Teams

GTC BLUE

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs WP NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Holly Welsh / Karen Allaire6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Karen Ryan vs Trace Salzano / Kelly Goodnough6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaura High / Jennifer Kaufman vs Ginny Crise / Kerri Brown6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2021-07-18vs DTC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Katherine Koch / Erica Bissette6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura High / Jada Dixon vs Elaina Grauer / Jennifer Monks1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Ryan / Maureen Clarke vs Brenda Byrne / Mary McFadyen1-6, 4-6
2021-07-13vs CP REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Ryan / Maureen Clarke vs Deborah Clark / Lena Ursten Hobbs6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura High / Jada Dixon vs Tammy Chamberlain / Ciel Lawrence6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs April Leahy / Katai Itta7-6, 6-3
2021-07-06vs SKY BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura High / Jada Dixon vs Lyndsey McLaughlan / Joy Kathleen Murphy2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Rachel Byrne / Katie Garrison6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Karen Ryan vs Camilla Almuti / Christine Atkinson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-22vs GTC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Susan Bruce / Alison Mueller6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura High / Jada Dixon vs Rachel Brand / Danielle Dahl7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaureen Clarke / Karen Ryan vs Jennifer Stack / Sabine Hoover6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-06-15vs STAP REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura High / Jada Dixon vs Wendy Berhman / Molly Holland6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Ryan / Maureen Clarke vs Heather Colliander / Shannon Brooks3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Sarah Sexton / Julie Pellet6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-06-08vs CM GREENWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Tipps / Maureen Clarke vs Ali Boyd / Jennifer I0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCyndie Miller / AMY SITZE vs Lydia Tzagoloff / Dianne Perry5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura High / Jada Dixon vs Jane Miceli / Jan Robbins6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cyndie Miller
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
AMY SITZE
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.59
Maureen Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.52
Jada Dixon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Karen Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Laura High
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cyndie Miller + AMY SITZE552257% games+1.9% vs expected
Jada Dixon + Laura High4646% games+1.8% vs expected
Karen Ryan + Maureen Clarke82144% games−0.6% vs expected
Karen Ryan + AMY SITZE3344% games−5.4% vs expected
AMY SITZE + Laura High033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cyndie Miller
71W–51L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
AMY SITZE
71W–42L career · 7 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.71
Maureen Clarke
28W–56L career · 7 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Jada Dixon
26W–68L career · type A · 6 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
2.52
Karen Ryan
22W–64L career · 6 lines in 2021
54%46%<1%
2.49
Laura High
9W–19L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.