Teams

Malibu

2026 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 5.0

12 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · Ventura - Women 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sets and the Suburbs000000
2Malibu000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
Page Bartelt
published
4.91
Dina McBride
published 5
4.86
Tracie Currie
published
4.82
Holly Verner
published
4.81
Criss Rodriguez
published 5
4.72
Daron Moore
published 5
4.67
4.42
Samantha Gutstadt
published
4.41
Karen Sarkissian
published
4.12
Shanna Reznik
published
Kelsey Mckinnon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dina McBride + Page Bartelt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Page Bartelt
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Dina McBride
19W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.91
Tracie Currie
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.86
Holly Verner
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.82
5
Criss Rodriguez
12W–6L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Daron Moore
3W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.72
5
Jennifer Cotone Gossett
131W–67L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.71
0
Sabrina Man-Son-Hing
9W–7L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
Samantha Gutstadt
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.42
Karen Sarkissian
6W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
4.41
Shanna Reznik
10W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.12
Kelsey Mckinnon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.