Teams

SATA/Judith Buxbaum

2022 SATA USTA Adult 65 & Over (Women) - Spring · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.21 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Ann Grant
published 3.5
3.26
Charlotte Lord
published 3.5
3.24
Linda David
published
3.12
Diane Harwell
published 3.5
3.04
Karen Bickley
published
Beverly Long
published 3
2.75
Catherine Miller
published 3
2.70
Gayle Curtiss
published 3
2.48
Anita Quinn
published 3
Judith Buxbaum
published
Loraine Phillips
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Bickley + Charlotte Lord1631% games−12.5% vs expected
Diane Harwell + Ann Grant123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Grant
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Charlotte Lord
16W–21L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Linda David
16W–24L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Diane Harwell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Karen Bickley
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Beverly Long
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Catherine Miller
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Gayle Curtiss
19W–26L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Anita Quinn
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.48
Judith Buxbaum
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Loraine Phillips
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.