Teams

LCTA55/Cechak/LTPDI

Other Mixed Doubles 55 & Over Adult · 7.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
3.44
Deborah McFann
published 3.5
3.39
Holly Bates
published
3.38
Bill Park
published 3.5
3.33
William Lark
published
3.31
Elaine Cechak
published
Daniel Hill
published 3.5
Diana Lippman
published 3.5
3.23
Karen SZEGI-Wimpey
published
3.21
Tony Colizzi
published
3.20
Ron Magnuson
published
3.17
Christopher Cechak
published 3.5
3.13
Dana Cumbie
published 3.5
3.13
Diane Rozier
published 3.5
3.10
Gary Snyder
published
2.77
Carol Noble
published 3
Maureen Eimers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christopher Cechak + Elaine Cechak3448% games−6.6% vs expected
Holly Bates + William Lark6262% gamesnot enough data
Deborah McFann + William Lark134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlene Magnuson
60W–54L career · type A · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
3.5
Deborah McFann
101W–37L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Holly Bates
90W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Bill Park
82W–49L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.38
William Lark
63W–49L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Elaine Cechak
51W–33L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Daniel Hill
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Diana Lippman
33W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen SZEGI-Wimpey
62W–60L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Tony Colizzi
38W–27L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Ron Magnuson
33W–44L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Christopher Cechak
23W–32L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Dana Cumbie
46W–52L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Diane Rozier
23W–44L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Gary Snyder
40W–23L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.10
3
Carol Noble
34W–59L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Maureen Eimers
29W–28L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.