Teams

No Strings Attached

2022 Baltimore Adult 18 & Over · Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-15vs The Green TeamSplit 11
L#1 SinglesColleen Begg vs Briana Stine2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Pamela Li6-1, 6-1
2022-06-12vs Fast n FuriousLost 01
L#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Jennifer Exelby2-6, 0-6
2022-06-08vs Volley GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesColleen Begg / Sheri Mazurkevich vs Jennifer Rauhofer / Shannon Biggs4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Garcia / Bernadette Burger vs Laura Lewandowski / Simone Bazos5-1
2022-05-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBernadette Burger / Sheri Mazurkevich vs Christine Kim-Ripley / Gina Keelty3-6, 1-6
2022-05-23vs Fast n FuriousLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Brill / Bernadette Burger vs Carol Fitzpatrick / Rachel Ravalico4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Jennifer Exelby2-6, 3-6
2022-05-21Won 20
W#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Elizabeth Scott6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBernadette Burger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-17Split 11
W#1 SinglesBernadette Burger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesPatrice Holtz / Keyonna Baker vs Constance Rogers / Jennifer Grow3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-05-15Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBernadette Burger vs Joyce Lin - (DQ)*1-6, 0-6
2022-04-30vs The Green TeamSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Briana Stine3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Coles / Colleen Begg vs Jennifer Guertin / Constance Rogers7-5, 6-6
2022-04-24vs Volley GirlsWon 10
W#2 SinglesKeyonna Baker vs Lena Brandenburg6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Baltimore Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Keyonna Baker
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.80
2.65
Bernadette Burger
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.58
Colleen Begg
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Pamela Mary Gogol
published
Patrice Holtz
published
Sheri Mazurkevich
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Begg + Christine Hammann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Keyonna Baker
165W–125L career · 14 lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Christine Hammann
84W–47L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Bernadette Burger
56W–70L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Colleen Begg
35W–40L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Pamela Mary Gogol
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Patrice Holtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheri Mazurkevich
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.