Teams

Diamonti/LHCC/Foothills

2026 Foothills Mixed Doubles - 40 & over · 3.5 Mixed Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesTisha Zagaroli / Charlie Zagaroli vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-30vs Qualifier TeamSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChris Lovern / Ryan Lovern vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTisha Zagaroli / Charlie Zagaroli vs Mindy Bolick / Kevin Lickman2-6, 2-6
2026-07-23vs Qualifier TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesJason Harris / Beth Blair vs Robert Womack / Sandra Reid6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErika Rowland / Lawrence Thompson vs Josh Wood / Sandi Horyza6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarsha Diamonti / Greg Diamonti vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-16vs Qualifier TeamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarsha Diamonti / Greg Diamonti vs Kevin Lickman / Sandi Horyza4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChris Lovern / Ryan Lovern vs Mark Eckard / Sandra Reid6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Chris Lovern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Lawrence Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Erika Rowland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Tisha Zagaroli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Ryan Lovern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Marsha Diamonti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Beth Blair
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Jason Harris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Greg Diamonti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.75
Charlie Zagaroli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marsha Diamonti + Greg Diamonti9749% games+1.4% vs expected
Ryan Lovern + Chris Lovern9163% gamesnot enough data
Charlie Zagaroli + Tisha Zagaroli224 matchesnot enough data
Erika Rowland + Lawrence Thompson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Lovern
73W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Lawrence Thompson
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Erika Rowland
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Tisha Zagaroli
149W–87L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Ryan Lovern
79W–47L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Marsha Diamonti
246W–258L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Beth Blair
26W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Jason Harris
20W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3.5
Greg Diamonti
33W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Charlie Zagaroli
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.