Teams

Boggs

2025 Lubbock Adult League 18 & Over · 3.0 Ladies

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-05vs McNeill/BallouLost 13
W#1 DoublesCody Boggs / Kelly Welch vs Aaron Gray / Kourtney Hanslik6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Kathy Sim2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Cartwright / Teresa Popp vs Jacqueline Ballou / Clair Jones4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVickie Webb / Lynn Jackson vs Devin Street / Ashlen Sturdivant2-6, 0-6
2025-04-28vs HendersonLost 04
L#1 SinglesMarqui Benavides vs Haley Hughston1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Cartwright / Teresa Popp vs Mary Axelrud / Kylie Burt2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLingxi Xu vs Ann-Marie Saleh6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Hutchins / Lana Branam vs Kacy Bednarz / Sydney Farris0-6, 1-6
2025-03-26vs McNeill/BallouLost 13
L#1 DoublesCody Boggs / Kelly Welch vs Kourtney Hanslik / Ellie Carson1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMarqui Benavides vs Brittany Llanas0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Cartwright / Teresa Popp vs Aaron Gray / Kathy Sim3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Hutchins / Lana Branam vs Ashlyn Landrum / Ashlen Sturdivant1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Cody Boggs
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.90
Linda Cartwright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Teresa Popp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Lingxi Xu
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Barbara Wallace
published 3
Kelly Welch
published
Lana Branam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Hutchins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Marqui Benavides
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Vickie Webb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Cartwright + Teresa Popp4550% games−0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cody Boggs
39W–22L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Linda Cartwright
4W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Teresa Popp
6W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Lingxi Xu
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Barbara Wallace
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Welch
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lana Branam
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Hutchins
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marqui Benavides
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vickie Webb
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.