Teams

KTC-Howitt

2023 OH OV WINTER A55&O · 2023 Winter A55&O 7.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.36 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2023 Winter A55&O 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Garri Carter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.40
Nancy Howitt
published
3.31
Kelly Scudder
published
Debbie Heinz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Helen Anagho-Beny
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Lyuda Fishman
published
3.12
Deborah Whitcomb
published 3.5
3.12
Kim McCrae
published
3.05
Sunhe Rhee
published
3.02
Kathryn Staiger
published
3.01
Pamela Disser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Carol Volkerding
published 3
Debbie Doyle
published 3
2.74
Cathy Hahn
published 3
Bonnie Bennett
published
Laura Garza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sue Karnitis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Howitt + Pamela Disser7065% games+9.1% vs expected
Helen Anagho-Beny + Kim McCrae6558% games+7.1% vs expected
Kelly Scudder + Laura Garza5355% games+3.9% vs expected
Nancy Howitt + Sunhe Rhee8260% games+3.8% vs expected
Nancy Howitt + Lyuda Fishman4553% games+0.8% vs expected
Kim McCrae + Pamela Disser41540% games+0.1% vs expected
Nancy Howitt + Laura Garza5158% games−1.4% vs expected
Nancy Howitt + Kelly Scudder6458% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Garri Carter
131W–147L career · 5 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Nancy Howitt
130W–64L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kelly Scudder
127W–96L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Debbie Heinz
40W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Helen Anagho-Beny
50W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lyuda Fishman
112W–130L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Deborah Whitcomb
156W–182L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Kim McCrae
145W–179L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
Sunhe Rhee
100W–88L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Kathryn Staiger
53W–78L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Pamela Disser
89W–108L career · 3 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Carol Volkerding
14W–23L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Debbie Doyle
40W–18L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cathy Hahn
25W–38L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
2.74
Bonnie Bennett
55W–46L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Garza
35W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sue Karnitis
106W–87L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.