Teams

Boyd/Whealdon/18/2.5/CWN/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 NO (18&O) Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 NO (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Muscenti /18/2.5/CWN/CP000000
2Boyd/Whealdon/18/2.5/CWN/CP000000
3Kang/18/2.5/CWN/XU000000
4Williamson/18/2.5/CWN/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Emma Kennedy
published
2.42
Elizabeth Boyd
published
2.31
Elizabeth St John
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cynthia Hodnett
published 2.5
2.24
Mari Krane
published
2.20
Larissa Millet
published
2.19
Elizabeth Meeks
published
2.17
Alita Caparotta
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.12
Mary Letsch
published
2.09
Abby Currie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.08
Mary Deynoodt
published
2.05
Melissa Aucoin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.98
Jill Maumus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mari Krane + Jill Maumus2543% games−0.8% vs expected
Mary Deynoodt + Mary Letsch2340% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Boyd + Elizabeth Meeks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Kennedy
12W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.76
Elizabeth Boyd
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
Elizabeth St John
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
2.5
Cynthia Hodnett
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mari Krane
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Larissa Millet
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Elizabeth Meeks
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Alita Caparotta
8W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Mary Letsch
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Abby Currie
1W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Mary Deynoodt
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Melissa Aucoin
0W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Jill Maumus
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.