Teams

WP RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-18vs CP NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesSanda McMillan / Sue Hickey vs Katie Kennedy / Annie Rapson6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDeborah Alper vs Carrie Lee7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBethany Sheldon / Suzette Emerson vs Christine Regis / Jessica Sanderson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimberly Allen / Alison Mizer vs Christian Hawley / Mandy Nadler6-4, 6-1
2024-07-11vs CHCC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeborah Alper / Sue Hickey vs Dananne Solomon / Kim Addlesperger6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBethany Sheldon / Minou Cramer vs Vanessa Ramich / Stacey Knox3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Gart / Kimberly Allen vs Elise Markel / Callie Nowicki6-7, 4-6
2024-07-04vs CACM GREENLost 04
L#1 DoublesSuzette Emerson / Sue Hickey vs Rachel Nutt / Sara Vanek5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMinou Cramer vs Kelly Fitz0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSanda McMillan / Deborah Alper vs Emily Pruisner / Monique Wehrle4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlison Mizer / Bethany Sheldon vs Heather Mitchell / Charlotte Gillespie6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-07-01vs DTC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesAlison Mizer / Sanda McMillan vs Karen Polzin / Helene Grall-Johnson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDeborah Alper vs Nancy Alterman6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Parker / Sue Hickey vs Maura Spangler / Rebecca Wulliman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzette Emerson / Bethany Sheldon vs Kristin Bokelman / Natasha Gallaway6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-27vs SKY TEALWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlison Mizer / Sanda McMillan vs Kim Brummond / Joy Kathleen Murphy6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKaitlyn Twist vs Vicki Devine2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSue Hickey / Nicole Parker vs Jennifer Lester / Sandra Schumm6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeborah Alper / Kimberly Allen vs Jeffra Frank / Jennifer Pearson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2024-06-13vs CACM YELLOWWon 31
W#1 DoublesSue Hickey / Sanda McMillan vs Karla Simons / Bev Morrow6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDeborah Alper vs Mary Mathis6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAlison Mizer / Bethany Sheldon vs Paula Broe / Helen Wilson6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKimberly Allen / Rebecca Gart vs Melanie Darden / Juli Bulloch4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-06vs GPTC GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesBethany Sheldon / Suzette Emerson vs Esther Song / Nicoal Sperrazza6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLinda Thurman vs Carrie Palmer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Gart / Nicole Parker vs Suzanne Lougheed / Susan Rosenthal6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAlison Mizer / Kimberly Allen vs Lynn Turner / Rene Moore6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Sue Hickey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Sanda McMillan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Minou Cramer
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Suzette Emerson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Linda Thurman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Alison Mizer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Deborah Alper
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Bethany Sheldon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Rebecca Gart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kaitlyn Twist
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bethany Sheldon + Alison Mizer10560% games+7.7% vs expected
Rebecca Gart + Suzette Emerson4357% games+7.0% vs expected
Sanda McMillan + Suzette Emerson4161% games+6.9% vs expected
Bethany Sheldon + Suzette Emerson121053% games+6.2% vs expected
Alison Mizer + Sanda McMillan12561% games+1.6% vs expected
Sue Hickey + Sanda McMillan8260% games+1.5% vs expected
Rebecca Gart + Deborah Alper3255% gamesnot enough data
Bethany Sheldon + Sanda McMillan3261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sue Hickey
103W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Sanda McMillan
93W–58L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Minou Cramer
65W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Suzette Emerson
143W–101L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Linda Thurman
47W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Alison Mizer
79W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Deborah Alper
156W–82L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Bethany Sheldon
59W–48L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Rebecca Gart
89W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Kaitlyn Twist
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.