Teams

EUnderwood (Russell)

2023 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-04vs NChristensen/Layne (Southampton)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeigh Ingram / Mary Wegener vs Paige Golding / W Kay Bridges1-6, 3-6
2023-04-21vs SDickson (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Barnes / Mary Wegener vs Cyndie Hobson / Kristine Predmore6-7, 3-6
2023-04-19vs LSobodash (PLCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Hood / Leigh Ingram vs Laura Sobodash / Cyndi Thilo6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesPATRICIA DRIES / Mary Wegener vs Sally Lowrance / Jane Johnsen7-6, 6-3
2023-03-31vs NMurphy (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLeigh Ingram / Terri Hood vs Lisa Wilson / Sherry Teat6-4, 6-3
2023-03-17vs JGieker (LifeTime)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKate Palanica / Leigh Ingram vs Julie Gieker / Wendi Peters2-6, 2-6
2023-03-10vs KKing (Weddington)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Wegener / PATRICIA DRIES vs Barbara Northrup / AMY SAFIR1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
PATRICIA DRIES
published
3.24
Terri Hood
published
3.20
Kate Palanica
published
3.18
Sharon Norman
published
3.12
Janet Fiedor
published
3.09
Leigh Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.04
Ellen Underwood
published
2.80
Mary Wegener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Karol Kreshon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Wegener + Leigh Ingram3840% gamesnot enough data
Janet Fiedor + Terri Hood123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

PATRICIA DRIES
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Terri Hood
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Kate Palanica
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Sharon Norman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Janet Fiedor
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Leigh Ingram
29W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
3.09
Ellen Underwood
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Mary Wegener
15W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Karol Kreshon
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.