Teams

SS-H BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - DEN · MEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-16vs CSU REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Stromberg / Jose Amador vs Scott Schaffer / Christopher Fox4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Hand / Adam Burbary vs Kevin Ellis / Doug Ruffin4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRob Hill / Mike Peterson vs Marco Scalise / Michael Gugliotto7-5, 7-5
2023-07-15vs CVTA NAVYSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEric Stromberg / Jose Amador vs Peter Braun / Jake Thamm6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDavid Hand / JD Ready vs David Jansen / James Leroux5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-14vs LTA-Q GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesJose Amador / Mike Peterson vs Wayne Sidney / Mark Hinman6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Hand / JD Ready vs Judson Smith / Joseph Fryberger6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdam Burbary / Tomo Watanabe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-14vs SS-H REDWon 20
W#2 DoublesEric Stromberg / Jose Amador vs Brian Frederick / Chris Swank6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Hand / Adam Burbary vs Bryan Sutter / Andy Duncan7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 9.0 - 55 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
David Biermann
published 4.5
4.33
Tomo Watanabe
published
Eric Stromberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Jose Amador
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
David Hand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
JD Ready
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Mike Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.08
Adam Burbary
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.98
Benoit Guin
published 4.5
Jeffrey Todd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Stromberg + Jose Amador271158% games+1.1% vs expected
Adam Burbary + JD Ready181453% games−2.0% vs expected
Benoit Guin + David Biermann404 matchesnot enough data
Adam Burbary + David Hand213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Biermann
63W–21L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
4.43
Tomo Watanabe
48W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Eric Stromberg
105W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Jose Amador
315W–162L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
David Hand
61W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
JD Ready
119W–116L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
Mike Peterson
51W–29L career · 1 line in 2023
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Adam Burbary
52W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Benoit Guin
16W–15L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.98
Jeffrey Todd
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.