Teams

Midtown/Montserrat

2026 Broward Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.27 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-06vs Midtown/ParkWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnabella Este / Natalia Smyth vs Carol Kelly / Lidamari Lopez6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGiannina Aguirre / Giuliana Zunino-Ribas vs Giedre Carrillo / Lucrecia Lappas3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMaria Alejandra Sempe / Deborah Marshall vs Simone Garrett / Maria Berezina6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2026-08-11vs Veltri/ContrerasLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Alejandra Sempe / Maria Diaz vs Daniela Romay / Betzabeth Toledo6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMariana Rodriguez / Natalia Smyth vs Melissa Morim / Patrizia Smouse-Gomez2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSima Sadoughi / Martha Barliza vs ABIGAIL JOHNSON / Silvia Carreno3-6, 6-7
2026-08-04vs Wrc/CordobaWon 21
W#1 DoublesGiannina Aguirre / Natalia Smyth vs Lory Sakay / Xia Jin3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnabella Este / Ana Milano vs Pilar Escobar / Gabriela Rada6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdriana Montserrat / Deborah Marshall vs JANNETH CARBALLIDO / Maria Agustina Sanchez2-6, 2-6
2026-07-28vs Midtown/ParkLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnabella Este / Deborah Marshall vs Lucrecia Lappas / Mariana Nascimento4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGiannina Aguirre / Natalia Smyth vs Gabriela Reyes / Rosane Villordo7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesYrma Petersen / Alejandra Cofino vs Rosmary Bohorquez / Jhuma Chaudhuri3-6, 5-7
2026-07-21vs Piccolo/SanabriaLost 12
L#1 DoublesGiannina Aguirre / Martha Barliza vs Eileen Escarda / CAROLINA SANABRIA3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSima Sadoughi / Yrma Petersen vs Evelyn Daniels / Jessica Novikow0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAlejandra Cofino / Giuliana Zunino-Ribas vs Natalia Vesga / Thamara Pichardo6-3, 7-6
2026-07-07vs Veltri/ContrerasLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnabella Este / Shamena Khan vs Raeven Yester / Carolina Santamarina6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMariana Rodriguez / Ana Milano vs Ieva Sciukauskaite / Betzabeth Toledo4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Alejandra Sempe / Natalia Smyth vs Sandi DiGiaimo / Liliana Arbelaez3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Alejandra Cofino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Anabella Este
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.31
Maria Alejandra Sempe
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Giannina Aguirre
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.23
Adriana Montserrat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Sima Sadoughi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Martha Barliza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.03
Yrma Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.02
Shamena Khan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Natalia Smyth
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Ana Milano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Giuliana Zunino-Ribas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Maria Diaz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sima Sadoughi + Giannina Aguirre6162% games+11.4% vs expected
Martha Barliza + Shamena Khan12656% games+6.3% vs expected
Giannina Aguirre + Maria Alejandra Sempe5449% games+5.6% vs expected
Anabella Este + Alejandra Cofino15758% games+4.1% vs expected
Anabella Este + Adriana Montserrat6851% games+3.2% vs expected
Anabella Este + Giannina Aguirre91055% games+3.0% vs expected
Adriana Montserrat + Maria Alejandra Sempe262351% games+0.4% vs expected
Alejandra Cofino + Adriana Montserrat13753% games−0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alejandra Cofino
140W–93L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
3.5
Anabella Este
124W–84L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Maria Alejandra Sempe
103W–93L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
Giannina Aguirre
121W–69L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Adriana Montserrat
136W–130L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Sima Sadoughi
207W–136L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Martha Barliza
50W–91L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Yrma Petersen
122W–116L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Shamena Khan
133W–140L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Natalia Smyth
18W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Ana Milano
90W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Giuliana Zunino-Ribas
61W–91L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Maria Diaz
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.