← Teams

SAC-Daniels/Barnatan

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.6 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Cassia Carpio
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.35
Timothea Barnatan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Parul Saxena
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Jamie Heberlein
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.68
Jeane Anastas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Shoully Mendyke
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 0
Results11 ties
2019-03-16Won 2–1
W#2 DoublesWeizhen Guo / Shoully Mendyke vs Jodee Midura / Susan Lively6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTimothea Barnatan vs Karen Groenweghe6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesParul Saxena / Cindy Sankhagowit vs Lisa Wisthoff / Joanne Smith6-3, 6-3
2019-03-09Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesCassia Carpio / Cindy Sankhagowit vs Colleen Walker / Joanna Medinger6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJamie Heberlein vs Stefanie Avery6-4, 7-5
2019-03-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCassia Carpio / Jenna Dornblaser vs Ashley Schneider / Donna Boje7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWeizhen Guo / Shoully Mendyke vs Alison Marr / Suki Birge6-3, 6-2
2019-02-23Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJenna Dornblaser / Parul Saxena vs Tina Farrelly / Jennifer Scott6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Daniels / Timothea Barnatan vs Anna Koepke / Stephanie Haas6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWoohyung Kim / Jamie Heberlein vs Ariana White / Joyce Wang7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2019-02-17Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Cassia Carpio vs Donna Boje / Eileen Hart7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesWeizhen Guo / Shoully Mendyke vs Suki Birge / Angelina Warriner6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJamie Heberlein vs Angie Urrutia6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJeane Anastas / Cindy Sankhagowit vs Kathy Johnson / Sandi Martes6-1, 6-2
2019-02-03Lost 0–2
L#2 SinglesTimothea Barnatan vs Misuzu Komine6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnne Daniels / Parul Saxena vs Shannon Berry / June Fernandez6-2, 6-1
2019-01-26Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesAnne Daniels / Timothea Barnatan vs Jennifer Lucas / Kathleen Sullivan6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJamie Heberlein / Woohyung Kim vs Nozomi Bray / Chikako Hokanson6-3, 6-4
2019-01-05Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJenna Dornblaser / Cassia Carpio vs Mary Lowblad / Laura Maginnis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Parul Saxena vs Nancy Collins / Lisa Symmonds6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJeane Anastas / Rene Miller vs Loo Yah Leong / Wendy Nakatani6-1, 6-1
2018-12-08Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesShoully Mendyke / Jonathan Hong vs Gabriela McIntosh / Alex McIntosh6-2, 6-2
2018-12-08Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesTimothea Barnatan / Peter Brandenburger vs Huy Bui / Carly Vendegna6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesParul Saxena / Kok Waii Wong vs Parish Burns / Andy Bracken6-3, 6-4
2018-12-07Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesChinwoo Kim / Timothea Barnatan vs Flor Harrigan / Jonathan Hong6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Cassia Carpio
256W–91L career
2%98%0%
4.12
3.5
Timothea Barnatan
95W–117L career
0%98%2%
3.35
3.5
Parul Saxena
36W–43L career
2%98%0%
3.21
3.5
Jamie Heberlein
45W–47L career
31%68%1%
3.05
3
Jeane Anastas
14W–31L career
4%96%0%
2.68
0
Shoully Mendyke
31W–16L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.