Teams

PRC - English/Watford

2025 B'ham Fall - Adult 70 & Over Weekday · 3.0 Women - Monday

13 players · average NTRP 2.81 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-12-01vs TRC - Brunson/SealeLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy English / Jan Poe vs Betty Howell / Debbie Nesmith3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatti Rozelle / Ella Ruth Stewart vs Kathy Seale / Karen Duncan2-2
W#3 DoublesGaile Randall / Inez Sawyer vs Lea Brunson / Carol Edwards6-4, 6-2
2025-11-24vs PRC - ChaseLost 12
L#1 DoublesNikki Christopher / Gaile Randall vs Beatrice Strickland / Katherine Willett6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJan Poe / Nancy English vs Jimmie King / Carole Chomicz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatti Rozelle / Carleen Morin vs Amanda Certain / Karen Doyal5-7, 2-6
2025-11-17vs TRC - Brunson/SealeLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy English / Marie Watford vs Belinda Waldo / Jeanne Jowell2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesInez Sawyer / Dianne Foster vs Kathy Seale / Betty Howell2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElla Ruth Stewart / Patti Rozelle vs Celia Ellis / Karen Duncan6-4, 7-5
2025-11-03vs PRC - ChaseWon 21
L#1 DoublesGayle Leal / Carol Rutherford vs Jimmie King / Ann Swanson4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNancy English / Nikki Christopher vs Carole Chomicz / Karen Doyal0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDianne Foster / Inez Sawyer vs Alice Chase / Sally Penfield6-0, 6-2
2025-10-13vs PRC - ChaseLost 12
L#1 DoublesJan Poe / Nancy English vs Becky Gibson / Katherine Willett6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesElla Ruth Stewart / Marie Watford vs Carole Chomicz / Jimmie King6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGaile Randall / Gayle Leal vs Beverley Conner / Karen Doyal6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-06vs TRC - Brunson/SealeLost 03
L#1 DoublesDianne Foster / Gayle Leal vs Karen Duncan / Kathy Seale7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJan Poe / Inez Sawyer vs Belinda Waldo / Betsy Acken1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Watford / Nancy English vs Jeanne Jowell / Lea Brunson0-6, 1-6
2025-09-22vs PRC - ChaseWon 21
W#1 DoublesDianne Foster / Nikki Christopher vs Katherine Willett / Ann Swanson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGayle Leal / Carol Rutherford vs Becky Gibson / Amanda Certain4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJan Poe / Inez Sawyer vs Alice Chase / Sally Penfield6-1, 6-2
2025-09-15vs TRC - Brunson/SealeLost 12
L#1 DoublesDianne Foster / Nikki Christopher vs Betty Howell / Jeanne Jowell1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJan Poe / Inez Sawyer vs Karen Duncan / Kathy Seale6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGaile Randall / Carol Rutherford vs Lea Brunson / Sherri McKendree6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Jan Poe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Nikki Christopher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Gaile Randall
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Carleen Morin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Deborah Blair
published 3
Dianne Foster
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.48
Carol Rutherford
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.33
Ella Ruth Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Gayle Leal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Inez Sawyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Marie Watford
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy English
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Patti Rozelle
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Rutherford + Gaile Randall1441% games−6.3% vs expected
Jan Poe + Nancy English1643% games−9.3% vs expected
Jan Poe + Inez Sawyer3353% gamesnot enough data
Jan Poe + Gaile Randall314 matchesnot enough data
Dianne Foster + Patti Rozelle224 matchesnot enough data
Ella Ruth Stewart + Inez Sawyer123 matchesnot enough data
Ella Ruth Stewart + Patti Rozelle123 matchesnot enough data
Gayle Leal + Carol Rutherford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jan Poe
28W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
Nikki Christopher
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Gaile Randall
16W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Carleen Morin
1W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Deborah Blair
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dianne Foster
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Carol Rutherford
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Ella Ruth Stewart
8W–21L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
2.5
Gayle Leal
1W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Inez Sawyer
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie Watford
0W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy English
3W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Rozelle
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.