Teams

WH Ballines SSL A18-4.0M

2022 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player)

18 players · average NTRP 3.81 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-05-21vs WH Custodio SSL A18-4.0MWon 32
L#1 DoublesDre Ballines / Nathan Hindman vs Mike West / Sean Lindsay3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMatt Linsley vs Erik Larsen6-1, 4-2
W#2 DoublesNicolas Millet / Charles Krug vs Robert Padgett / William Hodgman7-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDale Thielbar vs Jeremy Nufer7-5, 2-0
L#3 DoublesEric Fournier / Robert Boynton vs Ryan Langejans / Marty McKenna5-7, 4-6
2022-04-30vs WH Custodio SSL A18-4.0MWon 32
W#1 DoublesDre Ballines / Dale Thielbar vs Robert Padgett / Sean Lindsay6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSimeon Darwick Birnbaum vs Jeremy Nufer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNicolas Millet / Charles Krug vs Marty McKenna / Greg Watts6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMatt Linsley vs Ian Person6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTyler Nobel / Franco Antias vs Zachary Hickner / William Hodgman3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI SSL A18&O 4.0 M (8 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Matt Linsley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.80
Dre Ballines
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Nicolas Millet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dale Thielbar
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Damond Timmerman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
Eric Fournier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Charles Krug
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Andrew Rathbun
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Brian Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Andrew Leneway
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.10
Tyler Nobel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Franco Antias
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hersh Bakshi
published
Justin James
published
Nathan Hindman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Boynton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Simeon Darwick Birnbaum
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Steve Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Krug + Nicolas Millet4650% games+1.0% vs expected
Robert Boynton + Eric Fournier12558% games−1.5% vs expected
Charles Krug + Dre Ballines3256% gamesnot enough data
Matt Linsley + Dre Ballines033 matchesnot enough data
Dale Thielbar + Nicolas Millet213 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Leneway + Andrew Rathbun123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Linsley
26W–21L career · 4 lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
4.07
4
Dre Ballines
104W–49L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Nicolas Millet
46W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Dale Thielbar
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Damond Timmerman
53W–45L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Eric Fournier
12W–5L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Charles Krug
58W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Andrew Rathbun
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brian Peterson
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Andrew Leneway
36W–38L career · 7 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Tyler Nobel
10W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Franco Antias
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Hersh Bakshi
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Justin James
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nathan Hindman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Robert Boynton
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Simeon Darwick Birnbaum
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Ray
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.