Teams

Hitmen 55+

2022 Neb. Adult 55&Over · 8.0 Adult Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-19vs NE/Thomas/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Porath / David Stoupa vs Brian Richmeier / Joseph Lopez-Wilson6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Crook / Doug Tegler vs Steve Baker / Thomas Christensen3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRoderick Harley / David Schmidt vs Ted Sherman / Kevin Shoemaker4-6, 3-6
2022-07-12vs NEWC/RonhovdeLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Stoupa / Mark Hinrichs vs Philip Cook / Paul Ronhovde4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Martini / Thomas Milburn vs H Damon Osborne / Stephen Collins2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRoderick Harley / Ryan Johnson vs Matthew Westfall / Mark Leahy1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-05vs WinquestWon 30
W#1 DoublesScott Porath / Doug Tegler vs Greg Allen / Ronn Winquest2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Northey / Ryan Johnson vs Steve Taylor / Brad Miller7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Stoupa / David Schmidt vs Clark Thompson / Chuck Kramer6-3, 6-2
2022-06-28vs WinquestLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Porath / Thomas Milburn vs Jonathan Kendall / Joe Meyers2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Crook / Roderick Harley vs Tracy Wright / Greg Allen0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Northey / Kim Martini vs Brad Miller / Chuck Kramer6-4, 7-6
2022-06-14vs NEWC/RonhovdeLost 03
L#1 DoublesRyan Johnson / Kim Martini vs Brian Beene / H Damon Osborne0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Pass / David Northey vs Philip Cook / Paul Ronhovde3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRoderick Harley / John Crook vs Mark Leahy / Matthew Westfall5-7, 0-6
2022-05-31vs NE/Thomas/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Schmidt / Thomas Milburn vs J Michael Seaton / Joseph Lopez-Wilson1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRoderick Harley / John Crook vs Ricardo Hernandez / Brian Richmeier6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDoug Tegler / Kim Martini vs Stephen Thomas / Steve Baker3-6, 2-6
2022-05-24vs NEWC/RonhovdeLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Porath / David Stoupa vs Paul Barnes / Philip Cook3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Pass / Mark Hinrichs vs Mark Leahy / Matthew Westfall4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRoderick Harley / Ryan Johnson vs Paul Ronhovde / H Damon Osborne1-6, 1-6
2022-05-10vs NE/Thomas/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Northey / David Stoupa vs Stephen Thomas / Ted Sherman4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKim Martini / David Schmidt vs Joseph Lopez-Wilson / J Michael Seaton2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Milburn / Doug Tegler vs Steve Baker / Brian Richmeier2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-26vs WinquestWon 21
W#1 DoublesScott Porath / David Northey vs Steve Taylor / Joel Knudson6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRyan Johnson / Roderick Harley vs Jonathan Kendall / Tracy Wright6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMark Hinrichs / Robert Pass vs Greg Allen / Clark Thompson6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 8.0 Adult Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NE/Thomas/55&Over8.0M9022514204
2NEWC/Ronhovde6320718217
3Hitmen 55+2762143296
4Winquest1862143301

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Schmidt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Doug Tegler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
David Stoupa
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.58
Scott Porath
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
David Northey
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
John Crook
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kim Martini
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mark Hinrichs
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ryan Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Thomas Milburn
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Porath + David Stoupa111050% games+1.5% vs expected
Thomas Milburn + Scott Porath3348% gamesnot enough data
Thomas Milburn + David Stoupa1534% gamesnot enough data
Doug Tegler + Scott Porath2345% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Johnson + Scott Porath3257% gamesnot enough data
Kim Martini + Thomas Milburn044 matchesnot enough data
Thomas Milburn + Doug Tegler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Schmidt
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Doug Tegler
40W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
David Stoupa
44W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
Scott Porath
56W–100L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
David Northey
14W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
John Crook
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Martini
7W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Hinrichs
6W–15L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Johnson
11W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Milburn
30W–61L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.