Teams

RFC:TBD:Chadbourne

2021 ME Tri Level · Men 3.5 South

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MAINE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2020-12-06vs RFC:Slicers:KrygerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Chadbourne / H Terence Hampson vs Christian Kryger / Gene Cote6-7, 3-6
2020-11-15vs RFC:MainelyMental:HardyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Chadbourne / H Terence Hampson vs John Cannon / Scott Hardy7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2020-10-31vs RFC:TBD:BowringLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Chadbourne / H Terence Hampson vs Joshua Graceffa / Chris Bowring3-6, 2-6
2020-10-12vs RFC:Slicers:KrygerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarc Chadbourne / H Terence Hampson vs Christian Kryger / Gene Cote6-2, 7-6
2020-10-03vs RFC:MainelyMental:HardyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Chadbourne / H Terence Hampson vs John Cannon / Michael Samson1-6, 3-6
2020-09-20vs RFC:TBD:BowringLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Chadbourne / H Terence Hampson vs Steven Buxton / Chris Bowring5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 South have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
H Terence Hampson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.43
Sante Calandri
published
3.40
Jerome Faure
published
3.37
Marc Chadbourne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

H Terence Hampson + Jerome Faure11265% games+4.3% vs expected
Sante Calandri + Jerome Faure19263% games+1.5% vs expected
H Terence Hampson + Marc Chadbourne171653% games−1.2% vs expected
Marc Chadbourne + Jerome Faure121153% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
H Terence Hampson
106W–123L career · 6 lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.46
Sante Calandri
138W–116L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%29%
3.43
Jerome Faure
207W–135L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.40
Marc Chadbourne
173W–147L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.