Teams

Godbold-Jones/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-13vs Chesney-Rust KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDarcy Hoffman / Elsa Roland vs Younsun Choi / Ashtyn Wright6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLeigh Gatto vs Jessie Hall0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Holt / Melissa Kirby vs Mandi McCrary / Colbey Keele0-6, 2-6
2024-12-03vs Nichols-Ervin/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeigh Gatto / Ashley Jones vs Caroline Ervin / Janet Nichols1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesElsa Roland vs Tricia Solberg5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCindy Holt / Darcy Hoffman vs Kimberly LeRoy / Ashley Rose5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-19vs Scott-Parks/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDarcy Hoffman / Cindy Holt vs Sarah Scott / Lea Parks1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeigh Gatto vs Ashley Hoskins0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Buchanan / Elsa Roland vs Julia Beets / Brittany Cudzilo3-6, 1-6
2024-11-12vs DoironTapp/KnoxvilleSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElsa Roland vs Carly OConnor1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Holt / Darcy Hoffman vs Kim Powell / Kellye Tapp6-3, 6-3
2024-10-29vs Chesney-Rust KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeigh Gatto / Melissa Kirby vs Jessie Hall / Mimi Rust0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesElsa Roland vs Colbey Keele1-6, 1-6
2024-10-22vs Nichols-Ervin/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeigh Gatto / Melissa Kirby vs Kimberly LeRoy / Ashley Rose3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDarcy Hoffman vs Tricia Solberg6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Holt / Elsa Roland vs Caroline Ervin / Betsy Wood2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Elsa Roland
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.51
Darcy Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
1.97
Meredith Godbold
published
1.96
Cindy Holt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.87
Leigh Gatto
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Holt + Leigh Gatto0623% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Holt + Darcy Hoffman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elsa Roland
47W–21L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
3
Darcy Hoffman
16W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Meredith Godbold
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
2.5
Cindy Holt
3W–23L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Leigh Gatto
3W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.