Teams

LeFevre 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesKevin VanVooren vs Rick Williamson6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDavid Vick vs William Craft6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesGene LeFevre vs BRIAN KING6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-10-01vs Augustine 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 02
L#1 SinglesKevin VanVooren vs Jason Lewis4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesNoah Carlson vs Anders Gustavsson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAnthony Scott Crawford vs Kevin Kemp1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesGene LeFevre vs Carl Mattacola6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesDavid Vick vs Chris Swinyer6-3, 6-4
2025-09-10vs Vorys 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 02
L#2 SinglesNoah Carlson vs Donald O'Brien2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesArick Tuhro vs Jack Royals4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesArick Tuhro vs Sean Jones2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAnthony Scott Crawford vs Saroj Patnaik6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesNoah Carlson vs Hagen Molitoris5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-27vs Augustine 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesDavid Vick vs Jason Lewis1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesKevin VanVooren vs Luke Mills7-5, 6-0
L#3 SinglesGene LeFevre vs Anders Gustavsson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKevin VanVooren vs Kevin Kemp6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesDavid Vick vs Chris Swinyer6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Kevin VanVooren
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.87
Arick Tuhro
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.85
Anthony Scott Crawford
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.83
David Vick
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.74
Gene LeFevre
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Noah Carlson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kevin VanVooren
20W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3
Arick Tuhro
27W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Anthony Scott Crawford
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
David Vick
13W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Gene LeFevre
22W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Noah Carlson
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.