Teams

Bradshaw Farm (Van Johnson)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Robin Schorr)

21 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-01-16vs Wexford (Arrie Lugar)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesPamela Tracy / Jo Marchildon vs Amanda Neal / Susan Webb5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Dudley vs Kim Mora6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMaureen Laselva / Lynne Lyons vs Lisa Frate / Jenny Lemoine6-4, 5-7, 6-4
L#3 DoublesChristine Trego / Heather Dinsmore vs Stephanie Chambers / Alison OConnell3-6, 6-2, 5-7
W#4 DoublesTiana Pauline / Jean Frazier vs Aubrie Mayeux / Ann McCarthy6-2, 6-3
2024-11-21vs Brookfield CC (Jackie Blyth)*Won 31
L#1 DoublesGail Deluca / Mary Beth Poncin vs Amy Strahan / Tara Fust4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Dudley vs Rebecca Meyer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLynne Lyons / Julie McCarty vs Jean Kahn / Rene Beavers6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTiana Pauline / Jean Frazier vs Suzanne Ashton / Re'An Geis6-2, 6-4
2024-11-18vs Towne Lake Hills (Janet Wix)*Won 32
L#1 DoublesLynne Lyons / Tiana Pauline vs Amelia McVay / Jenna Wix5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKatie Dudley vs Elise Graham6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesNatasha Koutnik / Jo Marchildon vs Sonja Lister / Ansley Astuto5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPatty Kaufman / Tracey Montz vs Darcy Sabo / Christina Thaggard6-0, 4-6, 6-2
W#4 DoublesTracy Willett / Jean Frazier vs Lisa Waters / Kelly Strickland6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Robin Schorr) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Katie Dudley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.82
Mary Beth Poncin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Leslie Dobeis
published
3.80
Jeanne Putzel
published
3.77
Heather Dinsmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Madlyn Bocinsky
published
3.71
Julie McCarty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Christine Trego
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Van Johnson
published
3.69
Maureen Laselva
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Patty Kaufman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Tracey Montz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Natasha Koutnik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Jean Frazier
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Gail Deluca
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Tiana Pauline
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.54
Pamela Tracy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Stephanie Hale
published
Jo Marchildon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lynne Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tracy Willett
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Tracy + Tracey Montz3452% games−1.5% vs expected
Tiana Pauline + Jean Frazier5547% games−3.6% vs expected
Maureen Laselva + Leslie Dobeis4346% games−4.5% vs expected
Patty Kaufman + Christine Trego5453% games−5.3% vs expected
Mary Beth Poncin + Gail Deluca3250% gamesnot enough data
Tiana Pauline + Pamela Tracy123 matchesnot enough data
Heather Dinsmore + Natasha Koutnik123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Dudley
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
Mary Beth Poncin
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
Leslie Dobeis
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Jeanne Putzel
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.80
Heather Dinsmore
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Madlyn Bocinsky
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Julie McCarty
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Christine Trego
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Van Johnson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Maureen Laselva
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Patty Kaufman
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Tracey Montz
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Natasha Koutnik
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Jean Frazier
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Gail Deluca
14W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
Tiana Pauline
16W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Pamela Tracy
14W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.54
Stephanie Hale
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Jo Marchildon
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynne Lyons
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Willett
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.