Teams

LJTheisen/NMP 18+ 3.0

2022 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Men 3.0 Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-09vs LJReiner/CSD Mon pmWon 20
W#2 DoublesJon Theisen / Francis Bolger vs Robert Hayton / Dave Harkins6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDavid James / Baxter Price vs Lou Raymond / Mansoor Baloch6-1, 6-1
2022-05-02vs LJFern/PACLost 02
L#1 SinglesJon Theisen vs Ivan Ruyle1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKeith MacVean / Baxter Price vs Jordan Lilley / David Peeler5-7, 4-6
2022-04-25vs LBSchmerge/WestportLost 03
L#1 DoublesJon Theisen / Bill Shehane vs Paul Childers / David Andrews4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Lloyd / Baxter Price vs Bae Simalayvong / Jason Wilkes1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKeith MacVean / David James vs James Laurenson / George Chast1-6, 0-6
2022-04-11vs LJReiner/CSD Mon pmWon 20
W#1 DoublesFrancis Bolger / Keith MacVean vs Robert Hayton / Billy Bonham6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid James / Baxter Price vs Jeff Reiner / Mark Kincer4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-04vs LJFern/PACLost 02
L#1 DoublesJon Theisen / Baxter Price vs Julius Fernandez / Ivan Ruyle0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKeith MacVean vs Russell Swift3-6, 1-6
2022-03-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJon Theisen vs David Andrews1-6, 1-6
2022-03-21vs LJReiner/CSD Mon pmWon 10
W#3 DoublesBaxter Price / Francis Bolger vs Billy Bonham / Robert Hayton6-2, 6-4
2022-03-15vs LBSchmerge/WestportSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKeith MacVean / Francis Bolger vs Paul Childers / Danny Ketola3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJon Theisen / David James vs George Chast / Jeff Ahlstedt6-1, 6-4
2022-03-14vs LJFern/PACLost 02
L#2 DoublesMark Lloyd / Jon Theisen vs Ivan Ruyle / Walter Rodriguez1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike Richards / Baxter Price vs David Peeler / Paul Sheehan1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Jon Theisen
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3
2.84
Neil McLean
published
2.77
Francis Bolger
published 3
2.61
Bill Shehane
published 3
2.58
Keith MacVean
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.40
Baxter Price
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith MacVean + Baxter Price4842% games+6.6% vs expected
Baxter Price + Jon Theisen2436% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jon Theisen
41W–64L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
2.87
Neil McLean
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Francis Bolger
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Bill Shehane
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Keith MacVean
34W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Baxter Price
44W–105L career · 7 lines in 2022
0%79%21%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.