Teams

Alexis Cass/Samantha Curtis 2.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS LONE STAR EVENT · W Lone Star 2.5 Sunday

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-17vs Austin Perez 2.5SWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamantha Curtis / Anna Meitzen vs Callye Bower / Kara Tibor8-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen Coffin / Karen Foust vs Marisa Montague / Mary Laurent8-1
W#3 DoublesAlexis Cass / Jacqueline Lindsey vs Merridy Toepfer / Teresa Watt8-2
2026-05-17vs Lisa Tran 2.5SWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Coffin / Karen Foust vs Ruth Pateau / Taliah Royal4-8
W#2 DoublesSamantha Curtis / Anna Meitzen vs Cheyanne Goings / Sarah Ashitey8-4
W#3 DoublesAlexis Cass / Jacqueline Lindsey vs Andriana Edwards / Liz Smith8-0
2026-05-17vs Jennifer Ann Garcia 2.5SWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Curtis / Anna Meitzen vs Jennifer Ann Garcia / Melanie Horton8-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen Coffin / Karen Foust vs Jaclyn Whisenant / Shannon Lundon6-8
W#3 DoublesJacqueline Lindsey / Alexis Cass vs Tracey Valentine / Jessica Moon8-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W Lone Star 2.5 Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Alexis Cass
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.70
Anna Meitzen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.69
Samantha Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Karen Foust
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Regina Moldovan
published
2.40
Jacqueline Lindsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Kathleen Coffin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexis Cass + Anna Meitzen6362% games+5.2% vs expected
Anna Meitzen + Samantha Curtis5260% games−1.0% vs expected
Karen Foust + Kathleen Coffin3256% gamesnot enough data
Karen Foust + Samantha Curtis224 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Cass + Karen Foust213 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Cass + Samantha Curtis123 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Cass + Jacqueline Lindsey303 matchesnot enough data
Regina Moldovan + Karen Foust213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alexis Cass
21W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.73
2.5
Anna Meitzen
21W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%7%93%
2.70
Samantha Curtis
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
Karen Foust
18W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%31%69%
2.56
Regina Moldovan
13W–19L career · no lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
2.5
Jacqueline Lindsey
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
Kathleen Coffin
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
Jessica Orsino-Jordan
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.