Teams

LA - Vamos!

2021 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 4.5

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesClaudia Vine / Jennifer Avila vs Kathryn Conley / Mika Katsuhara2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesEriko Shigenaga / Suzanne Cumbo vs Jennifer Day / Monica Georgescu3-6, 1-6
2021-11-21vs LA - Not Our FaultLost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Vine / Suzanne Cumbo vs Ayanna Maharry / Roselle Paskus3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-11-14vs LA - Sassy, Classy and SavageWon 20
W#1 DoublesClaudia Vine / Suzanne Cumbo vs Holly Hubsher / Frances Hong6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga vs Geraldine Brantley / Jill Bauman7-6, 6-3
2021-11-07vs LA - Not Our FaultWon 10
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Cumbo / Eriko Shigenaga vs Abbigail Fietzer / Michele Quan6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesClaudia Vine / Jennifer Avila vs Mika Katsuhara / April Hartstein6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEriko Shigenaga / Suzanne Cumbo vs Michelle Tong Luo / Anna Lyke6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-24vs LA - Sassy, Classy and SavageSplit 11
L#2 DoublesClaudia Vine / Suzanne Cumbo vs Brigitte Champion / Sherryl Chaffin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga vs Lily Reeves / Nancy Neuman6-4, 6-1
2021-10-16vs LA - Not Our FaultWon 10
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Cumbo / Eriko Shigenaga vs Amy Hampton / Roselle Paskus6-2, 1-4
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Cumbo / Claudia Vine vs Mika Katsuhara / Kathryn Conley0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga vs Brynna Pietz / Rachel Harbert4-6, 3-6
2021-09-25vs LA - Sassy, Classy and SavageWon 20
W#2 DoublesClaudia Vine / Suzanne Cumbo vs Brigitte Champion / Sherryl Chaffin4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga vs Iris Cox / Helen Brewer6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Felicity Flesher
published 4.5
4.15
Jennifer Avila
published
4.09
Claudia Vine
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.07
Eriko Shigenaga
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Marguerite Brook
published
4.00
Suzanne Cumbo
usually #2 Doubles 89%, also #1 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
Christy Foreman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eriko Shigenaga + Suzanne Cumbo182147% games+1.9% vs expected
Claudia Vine + Suzanne Cumbo637946% games−3.1% vs expected
Eriko Shigenaga + Claudia Vine7551% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Felicity Flesher
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
Jennifer Avila
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Claudia Vine
157W–138L career · 7 lines in 2021
24%76%<1%
4.09
4.5
Eriko Shigenaga
166W–146L career · 8 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
4.07
Marguerite Brook
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Suzanne Cumbo
105W–148L career · 9 lines in 2021
50%50%<1%
4.00
Christy Foreman
27W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.