Teams

KC-CC YELLOW

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER

14 players · average NTRP 2.93 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-05vs SS-LGT BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesDarren Poler / Judy Delzell vs Danielle Butler / Tommy Knappich6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJean Pullen / Randy Rosenburg vs Anne Fanganello / Gregory Gleason6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Angelini / Matt Lopez vs Natalia Maximova / Eric Manuel2-6, 5-7
2026-06-28vs BCST YELLOWSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDave Calderini / Christine Jacquet vs Michelle Johnston / Scott Johnston2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJudy Delzell / Darren Poler vs Patty Archuleta / David Archuleta6-1, 7-5
2026-06-21vs CCC SILVERWon 30
W#1 DoublesJean Pullen / Randy Rosenburg vs Amy Noverr / Peter Noverr6-3, 3-4
W#2 DoublesProsper Wang / VIRGINIA WANG vs Patti Knepper / Brad Knepper6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDave Calderini / Christine Jacquet vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-20vs PH BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Madison / David Madison vs Abigail Smith / Eric Thompson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Delzell / Darren Poler vs Erica Mallery / Randy White1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNelly Chavez / Angelo Chialva vs Kori White / Bret Bowser0-6, 1-6
2026-06-14vs LEBTC REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesVIRGINIA WANG / Prosper Wang vs Lyle Olson / Leanne Franke6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDarren Poler / Julie Madison vs Emily Dreyer / Jamie Dreyer4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Lopez / Christine Angelini vs Jeff Hathaway / Janee Wren0-6, 3-6
2026-05-31vs SS-LGT BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJean Pullen / Randy Rosenburg vs Anne Fanganello / Gregory Gleason6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristine Angelini / Matt Lopez vs Michelle Butzke / Eric Manuel0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesVIRGINIA WANG / Prosper Wang vs Jane Braaten / Phil Braaten6-2, 6-2
2026-05-24vs BCST YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Madison / David Madison vs Patty Archuleta / David Archuleta7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNelly Chavez / Angelo Chialva vs Liz Crowell / Nate Phillips0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDave Calderini / Christine Jacquet vs Scott Johnston / JILL KROOG7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Colorado/Kisch/MX40&Over6.0601537102
2HRCA-S GREEN511449114
3KC-CC YELLOW43111021180
4ARCA BLUE43101126198
5HG YELLOW34101124169
6LTA-P BLUE3491226208
7RRTC BLUE2451329184
8CCC SILVER2581330209
9SS-H ORANGE1661531205
10BCST YELLOW1651634225
11BRMST GOLD0731837238
12FOX YELLOW0712041249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angelo Chialva
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Prosper Wang
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Randy Rosenburg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Judy Delzell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Julie Madison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Darren Poler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Dave Calderini
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
VIRGINIA WANG
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Christine Angelini
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.36
Nelly Chavez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.26
Christine Jacquet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
David Madison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jean Pullen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Matt Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

VIRGINIA WANG + Prosper Wang3252% gamesnot enough data
Jean Pullen + Randy Rosenburg303 matchesnot enough data
Christine Angelini + Matt Lopez033 matchesnot enough data
Judy Delzell + Darren Poler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angelo Chialva
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Prosper Wang
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Randy Rosenburg
24W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Judy Delzell
59W–41L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.84
Julie Madison
20W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Darren Poler
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Dave Calderini
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
VIRGINIA WANG
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Christine Angelini
92W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
Nelly Chavez
7W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Christine Jacquet
73W–81L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
David Madison
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jean Pullen
7W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Matt Lopez
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.