Teams

Mo.Weimer18A

2026 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-04vs Mo.Lewis18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesSydney Koch / Kenna Haney vs Cristina Baker / Hollyanne Compton3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKate Haney vs Molly Lewis6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMollie Weimer / Brooke Bryand vs Suzanne Wahlstrom / Kaili Jacobson7-6, 6-2
2026-04-27vs La.Gentile18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKenna Haney / Mollie Weimer vs Vina Jordano / Joli Rueter2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKate Haney vs Nicole Nemmers6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSydney Koch / Stephanie Walsh vs Kristin Wehmeyer / Lauren Bradley3-6, 0-6
2026-04-13vs Da.Louzao18ALost 12
W#1 DoublesKate Haney / Kenna Haney vs Isabella Mormando / Savannah Walters6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesStephanie Walsh vs Katie Fielitz4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Rynearson / Sydney Koch vs Anna Swauger / Jennifer Welch6-0
2026-04-06vs Am.Brandon18ALost 12
W#1 DoublesKenna Haney / Sydney Koch vs Mary-Kate Knox / Shannon Aumer3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGeorganne Sanders vs Amanda Brandon0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMollie Weimer / Brooke Bryand vs Lisa Hammond / Colleen Devlin4-6, 2-6
2026-03-24vs Ma.Harber18AWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsay Rynearson / Kenna Haney vs Julie Ferrer / Meaghan Quindlen7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Haithcock vs Heather Johnson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMollie Weimer / Stephanie Walsh vs Jennifer Cecconi / Lisa Sullivan6-3, 6-1
2026-03-23vs Br.Robinson18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMollie Weimer / Laura Haithcock vs Bethany Stempien / Kristina Faulkner6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKenna Haney vs Olivia Grieser1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGeorganne Sanders / Sydney Koch vs Laura Yates / Brittany Robinson6-7, 2-6
2026-03-09vs Mo.Lewis18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Walsh / Georganne Sanders vs Callan Fike / Kalli Unthank1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMollie Weimer vs Molly Lewis1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Bryand / Kenna Haney vs Jill Orr / Anuja Acharya6-4, 6-3
2026-03-02vs La.Gentile18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesKenna Haney / Sydney Koch vs Lauren Gentile / Kelly Nels2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLaura Haithcock vs Sarah Ammirati7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKate Haney / Georganne Sanders vs Lauren Bradley / Teran Canterbury6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings30 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1La.Hampton18A8020411125
2Ch.Wellman18A7017410131
3Ca.WilliamsAden18A6115615152
4Me.Frost18A6114717163
5La.Gentile18A6219512135
6Az.Bell18A6216816158
7Br.Robinson18A6216821200
8El.Robinson18A62141021167
9Co.Hicks18A2.55214715144
10Je.Tyndall18A5213818153
11Em.Boyer18A4313817156
12Te.Marcott18A43101123187
13Me.Dougher18A43111024192
14Ma.Harber18A43111024185
15Ja.Stephan18A44131123187
16Ke.Hurter18A3311716129
17Be.Pitt18A3412920161
18Da.Louzao18A3481327198
19Mo.Lewis18A35111329214
20Mo.Weimer18A35101431235
21Ka.Manooch18A2571428201
22Lo.Stevens18A2581329199
23Ra.Rosen18A2571432225
24Ma.Evans18A2691532234
25Jo.Johnson18A2691533237
26Am.Brandon18A2661836224
27Di.Harper18A1531530193
28Je.Glennon18A1661531214
29Ni.Thomas18A0741736227
30Ka.Marotta18A0832142266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Kate Haney
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.39
Laura Haithcock
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Brooke Bryand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.33
Mollie Weimer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Lindsay Rynearson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.31
Stephanie Walsh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.28
Kenna Haney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.10
Sydney Koch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.05
Georganne Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenna Haney + Sydney Koch2344% gamesnot enough data
Mollie Weimer + Brooke Bryand213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kate Haney
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%50%50%
2.50
Laura Haithcock
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.39
2.5
Brooke Bryand
5W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
Mollie Weimer
4W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
Lindsay Rynearson
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
Stephanie Walsh
2W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
Kenna Haney
7W–11L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Sydney Koch
3W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Georganne Sanders
1W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.