Teams

DO 8.5M 18 & Over (Brown)

2025 Dothan USTA Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.07 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-03vs WTC - Men 8.5 ComboWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichael Johns / Derek Cotton vs Doyle Leggett / Kyle Johnson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-02vs WTC - Men 8.5 ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Johns / Sean McKeague vs Jackson Dennis / Doyle Leggett6-4, 6-4
2025-08-19vs WTC - Men 8.5 ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesBlake Early / Sean McKeague vs Gabriel Perkins / Justin Thomley6-4, 6-3
2025-08-17vs WTC - Men 8.5 ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesTravis Sykes / Sean McKeague vs Caleb Cruz / Paul Muller II6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichael Johns / Derek Cotton vs Doyle Leggett / Justin Thomley6-3, 2-0
W#3 DoublesBrad Brown / Travis Tressler vs Dustin Woodham / Kyle Johnson6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Blake Early
published 4.5
3.94
Davis Flowers
published 4
3.92
Brad Brown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Derek Cotton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Brandon Bachman
published 4
3.77
Clark Kuntz
published 4
3.75
Travis Sykes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Sean McKeague
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.44
Trent Hopton-Jones
published
Michael Johns
published
Travis Tressler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Travis Tressler + Sean McKeague2448% gamesnot enough data
Travis Sykes + Clark Kuntz1447% gamesnot enough data
Travis Sykes + Sean McKeague213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Blake Early
1W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Davis Flowers
6W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Brad Brown
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Derek Cotton
27W–15L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Brandon Bachman
20W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Clark Kuntz
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Travis Sykes
80W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Sean McKeague
71W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Trent Hopton-Jones
27W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
Michael Johns
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Tressler
57W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
William Morris
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.