Teams

Garner(DAY)65

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 65 & OVER · 3.0 WOMEN

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-17vs Schmid 65 DAY./LATEWon 20
W#1 DoublesSharon Sypniewski / Joan Cozza vs Dee Schmid / Irene Hathaway6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCam Griffin / Sylvia Jones vs GRACE FULGHAM / Brenda Reeves6-1, 6-3
2025-04-10vs SHUMWAY CPWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Garner / Ginger Wessell vs Bernice Burch / Donna Kuhn6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoan Cozza / Sylvia Jones vs Lynda Johnston / Kathleen Kear6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hardy / Susan Sorensen vs Robyn Schneider / Sandra Babyak7-6, 6-0
2025-04-06vs Moran/Fox - DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Garner / Belinda Landis vs Gina Mancinelli / Mary Moran6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJoan Cozza / Sylvia Jones vs Elizabeth Purcell / Beth van Doren6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJoAnna Mika / Susan Sorensen vs Barbara Rabinowitz / Deirdre Doyle6-4, 6-3
2025-03-28vs Schmid 65 DAY./LATEWon 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Garner / Sylvia Jones vs Liz Gustin / Janice Pflumm6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJo-Ann Skinner / Emily Mabry vs GRACE FULGHAM / Suzanne McDade6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRita Gilson / Susan Langley vs Joan Willey / Dee Schmid6-0, 7-6
2025-03-25vs Moran/Fox - DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesBelinda Landis / Sylvia Jones vs Sandra Cockrell / Paula Colaner6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDonna Garner / Jo-Ann Skinner vs Elizabeth Purcell / Beth van Doren0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hardy / Susan Sorensen vs Mary Moran / Liz Collett6-3, 6-0
2025-03-21vs SHUMWAY CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesBelinda Landis / Sylvia Jones vs Sandra Babyak / Donna Kuhn6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCam Griffin / Emily Mabry vs Bernice Burch / Christine Rogers4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Garner / Jo-Ann Skinner vs Gloria Lepari / Kathleen Kear6-1, 7-5
2025-03-09vs Schmid 65 DAY./LATEWon 30
W#1 DoublesBelinda Landis / Sylvia Jones vs Liz Gustin / Janice Pflumm6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJoan Cozza / Donna Garner vs Gloria Miller / Dee Schmid6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoAnna Mika / Rebecca Hardy vs LINDA DEFONTES / GRACE FULGHAM6-2, 6-0
2025-03-07vs Moran/Fox - DayWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoan Cozza / Sylvia Jones vs Gina Mancinelli / Paula Colaner6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBelinda Landis / Susan Langley vs Beth van Doren / Anne Piotrzkowski6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Hardy / Emily Mabry vs Elizabeth Purcell / Carol Teynolds7-5, 6-4
2025-03-04vs SHUMWAY CPWon 21
W#1 DoublesBelinda Landis / Ginger Wessell vs Pamela Boswell / Sandra Babyak6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCam Griffin / Sylvia Jones vs Gloria Lepari / Kathleen Kear4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDonna Garner / Rita Gilson vs Gayle Fulks / Christine Rogers6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Joan Cozza
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
Sylvia Jones
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.88
Sharon Sypniewski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Rebecca Hardy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Belinda Landis
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Ginger Wessell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Rita Gilson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cam Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Emily Mabry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
JoAnna Mika
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Susan Langley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jo-Ann Skinner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Sorensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Wessell + Belinda Landis3354% games−4.6% vs expected
Joan Cozza + Sylvia Jones303 matchesnot enough data
Belinda Landis + Sylvia Jones303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joan Cozza
16W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Sylvia Jones
20W–2L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
Sharon Sypniewski
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.88
Rebecca Hardy
9W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Belinda Landis
16W–8L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Ginger Wessell
18W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Rita Gilson
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Cam Griffin
1W–2L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Emily Mabry
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
JoAnna Mika
9W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Susan Langley
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Jo-Ann Skinner
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Sorensen
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.