Teams

McMullen Herrera

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 4.5 M Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-25Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGreg Hilbert vs Juan Yannuzzi0-6, 0-6
2022-05-21vs Pinellas - Countryside/BilgerLost 01
L#3 DoublesDane Houston / Daniel Beck vs Michael Rothberg / Martin Black2-6, 2-6
2022-05-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesGreg Hilbert vs Phil Hubbell6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-04-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGreg Hilbert / Daniel Beck vs Matthew Bilger / Juan Yannuzzi4-6, 0-6
2022-04-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGreg Hilbert / Kris Szeszko vs Tim OBrien / Michael Erbe4-6, 2-6
2022-04-02Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGreg Hilbert vs Nathan Walker3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Ray Pasinski
published
3.76
Lance Hill
published
3.67
Tom Berning
published
3.56
Greg Hilbert
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Dane Houston
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
Brent Filbert
published
Steve Crivello
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Pasinski
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Lance Hill
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Tom Berning
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Greg Hilbert
25W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Dane Houston
155W–187L career · 5 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Brent Filbert
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Crivello
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.