Teams

KTC-Weaver

2023 OH OV SUMMER Mixed 40&O Dayton · 2023 MXD 40&O 8.0 Dayton

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-08-20vs QRRC-JohannesWon 10
W#2 DoublesEd Pearson / Melonie Johnson vs Christine Burkle / Clayton Burkle6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-09vs QRRC-JohannesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonald Nguyen / Tammy Kessler vs Ryan Maurer / Jennifer Lake2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAllison King / Ed Pearson vs Philip Pierce / Garri Carter6-4, 6-4
2023-06-11vs QRRC-JohannesWon 21
L#1 DoublesTammy Kessler / Donald Nguyen vs Lunilia Crespo / Ryan Maurer3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllison King / Ed Pearson vs Christine Burkle / Clayton Burkle6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelonie Johnson / Matthew Cary vs Ronit Thomeczek / Brian Thomeczek6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2023 MXD 40&O 8.0 Dayton
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SRTC-Smith5113512146
2KTC-Weaver2471123170

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Sandra Mudry
published
4.01
Namchi Le
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.85
Ed Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Melonie Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Donald Nguyen
published 4
3.67
Tammy Kessler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Matthew Cary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Edward McCall
published 3.5
Karen Weaver
published
Kevin Weaver
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melonie Johnson + Matthew Cary7657% games+10.7% vs expected
Kevin Weaver + Karen Weaver6549% games+4.8% vs expected
Tammy Kessler + Matthew Cary1641% games−4.0% vs expected
Ed Pearson + Melonie Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Mudry
102W–65L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.13
Namchi Le
49W–46L career · 2 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
4.01
4
Ed Pearson
38W–43L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
Melonie Johnson
208W–150L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Donald Nguyen
32W–49L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Kessler
173W–126L career · 2 lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.67
Matthew Cary
70W–69L career · 1 line in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Edward McCall
38W–32L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.39
Karen Weaver
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Weaver
30W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.