Teams

Nguyen - Stringing Winners

2025 Loudoun Singles · Loudoun Singles 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-05vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 02
L#1 SinglesScott Jacob vs Chip Hathaway2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTusar Chhotaray vs Karthik Prabala0-6, 0-6
2025-11-04vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#1 SinglesScott Jacob vs Robert Harland0-6, 3-6
2025-11-03vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionLost 01
L#3 SinglesTusar Chhotaray vs Karthik Prabala0-6, 0-6
2025-11-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesScott Jacob vs Forrest Jones6-2, 7-5
2025-10-25Split 11
L#2 SinglesTusar Chhotaray vs Shashin Koppula0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesEdward Xin vs David Truong6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-28vs Inanlar - Team CourtmastersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEdward Xin vs Forrest Jones6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTieng Nguyen vs Stephen Hanna4-6, 1-6
2025-09-15vs Inanlar - Team CourtmastersLost 02
L#2 SinglesDuy Nguyen-Khoa vs Tezcan Inanlar2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTieng Nguyen vs Forrest Jones1-6, 1-6
2025-09-13vs Cebulash - Who Is We? EvolutionSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEdward Xin vs Sandipp Rou Perepu6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesTusar Chhotaray vs Jesse Cebulash0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Tieng Nguyen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.88
Thuan Lai
published
3.85
Edward Xin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.80
Duy Nguyen-Khoa
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.71
Tusar Chhotaray
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.62
Scott Jacob
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Rishi Malhotra
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rishi Malhotra + Tusar Chhotaray3351% games+9.9% vs expected
Duy Nguyen-Khoa + Thuan Lai13858% games+5.5% vs expected
Tieng Nguyen + Edward Xin314 matchesnot enough data
Edward Xin + Scott Jacob044 matchesnot enough data
Scott Jacob + Tusar Chhotaray213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tieng Nguyen
157W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Thuan Lai
15W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Edward Xin
95W–50L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Duy Nguyen-Khoa
108W–62L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Tusar Chhotaray
83W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Scott Jacob
68W–80L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
Rishi Malhotra
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.