Teams

Grand Hampton - N. Loutas

2024 Hillsborough Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.57 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-17vs Cheval Sunday Swingers - L. HannaLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndres Buitrago / Pippin Gilbert vs Ken Patrick / Lorrie White7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-06vs Cheval Casual Sets - C. ConstantineSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPippin Gilbert / Ryan Mogel vs Todd Abrams / Melissa Chevalier7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDarin Garner / Katie Krysa vs Heather Perpetua / Gregory Perpetua2-6
2024-02-12vs Hills/Helme/40&Over7.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesShrini Varude / Pippin Gilbert vs Chris Donahue / Elizabeth Dickerson2-6, 6-7
2024-02-11vs Buckhorn I'd Hit That - J. TorresWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrent Mercke / Katie Krysa vs Susan MOSHER / Toi Phan7-5, 6-3
2024-01-21vs Cheval Sunday Swingers - L. HannaLost 02
L#1 DoublesDarin Garner / Thais Michael vs Louis Hanna / Amy Wydra7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJose Ramirez / Katie Krysa vs Kenneth Sallings / Fatima Zinober4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 40 and Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Dong Li
published 4
3.70
Alys Klouse
published 4
3.52
Darin Garner
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Pippin Gilbert
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.43
Javier Espinoza
published
3.27
Andres Buitrago
published 3.5
3.07
Xue Chan
published
3.07
Anne Orwa
published 3
2.92
Carrie Stiers
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.88
Thais Michael
published
Katie Krysa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Shrini Varude
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pippin Gilbert + Shrini Varude7158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dong Li
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Alys Klouse
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Darin Garner
104W–81L career · 3 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Pippin Gilbert
216W–126L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.51
Javier Espinoza
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Andres Buitrago
3W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Xue Chan
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Anne Orwa
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Carrie Stiers
72W–31L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Thais Michael
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Katie Krysa
60W–99L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shrini Varude
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.