Teams

Scordato 3.5 40+ singles

2026 South East Tennis Singles 40 & Over League · 3.5 Men 40 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-03vs CoganSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJohn Presswood vs Kevin Cogan4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesMike Jolley vs Bradley Matthews2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-03vs CoganLost 02
L#1 SinglesMike Jolley vs Kevin Cogan3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Presswood vs Bradley Matthews7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-25vs CoganLost 02
L#1 SinglesMichael Scordato vs Gino Galutera1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJohn Presswood vs Nicolas Morillo4-6, 2-6
2026-02-25vs CoganLost 02
L#1 SinglesMike Jolley vs Kevin Cogan3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJohn Presswood vs Bradley Matthews2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-12vs Aristy 3.5 40+Won 30
W#1 SinglesMike Jolley vs Jason Ferree6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDerek Mickler vs Randall Shelton6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJohn Presswood vs Scott Serkin6-3, 6-4
2026-01-27vs Aristy 3.5 40+Won 21
W#1 SinglesMike Jolley vs Peter Haley3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Scordato vs Scott Serkin6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesTim Worman vs Ramon Aristy0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-01-13vs Aristy 3.5 40+Won 21
L#1 SinglesTim Worman vs Hunter Gray6-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMike Jolley vs Randall Shelton6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDerek Mickler vs Scott Serkin7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cogan8019514160
2Scordato 3.5 40+ singles35101431226
3Aristy 3.5 40+0842041271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Derek Mickler
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Mike Jolley
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.16
John Presswood
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.15
Michael Scordato
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.00
Tim Worman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Ted Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Scordato + Derek Mickler5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Derek Mickler
28W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Mike Jolley
22W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
John Presswood
45W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Michael Scordato
21W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Tim Worman
36W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Ted Smith
18W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.