Teams

Esplanade Irving

2025 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter Weekend · 8.0 M Sunday

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-02vs Sarasota/Risquez/55&Over8.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesCraig Musson / Michael Irving vs Phillip Mihm / Steven Totterdale1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Kennedy / Randy Rubinstein vs Peter Laughlin / Grover Windsor0-6, 0-6
2025-02-23vs Sarasota/Risquez/55&Over8.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesLarry Kennedy / Randy Rubinstein vs Tim Mihm / Larry Anglada1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Irving / Steve Dragon vs Ron Forzani / Joseph Voss2-6, 1-6
2025-02-16vs Sarasota/Risquez/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrison / Jon Veldman vs Chris Canfield / Grover Windsor3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Irving / Craig Musson vs Marc Jarman / Joseph Voss2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Kennedy / Randy Rubinstein vs Ron Forzani / Tim Mihm2-6, 4-6
2025-02-02vs Sarasota/Risquez/55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrison / Jon Veldman vs Phillip Mihm / Joseph Voss0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Irving / Craig Musson vs Peter Laughlin / Larry Anglada3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRandy Rubinstein / Joe Alleva vs Ron Forzani / Steven Paley2-6, 1-6
2025-02-02vs Sarasota/Risquez/55&Over8.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Harrison / Steve Dragon vs Chris Canfield / Steven Totterdale1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Musson / Michael Irving vs Jim Fiumefreddo / Steven Paley2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 M Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Craig Musson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Joe Alleva
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Veldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Larry Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Irving
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Randy Rubinstein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Steve Dragon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Irving + Craig Musson044 matchesnot enough data
Randy Rubinstein + Larry Kennedy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Musson
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joe Alleva
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jon Veldman
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Larry Kennedy
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Irving
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Rubinstein
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Dragon
5W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.