Teams

PBTC MCCANN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - SOCO · WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-25vs CSCC DEEGANWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarisa Spangler / Vicki Becker vs Lynne Casebeer / Lynette Bickley7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChristina McCann vs Laura Dimberio6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudy Parry / Annette Copeland vs Genevieve Deegan / Rachael Deegan1-6, 1-6
2026-08-13vs MEMPK DIASWon 21
W#1 DoublesVicki Becker / Mandy Rivera vs Janet Neel / Elise Preston6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCharlotte McCormick vs Korrine Burger6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnnette Copeland / Paige Burns vs Megan Mueller / Jeanette Dias6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-06vs FHCS PASSMORELost 12
W#1 DoublesMandy Rivera / Vicki Becker vs Kristina Kilcoyne / Sally Amerine6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristina McCann vs Erica Lingenfield6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaige Burns / Carisa Spangler vs Julie Moser / Carole Passmore3-6, 3-6
2026-07-30vs CSCC DEEGANWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Copeland / Charlotte McCormick vs Lynne Casebeer / Lynette Bickley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesPaige Burns vs Kathryn Kennedy1-5
W#2 DoublesChristina McCann / Carisa Spangler vs Genevieve Deegan / Rachael Deegan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-23vs MEMPK DIASLost 12
L#1 DoublesMandy Rivera / Charlotte McCormick vs Korrine Burger / Tana Tornquist3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesCarisa Spangler vs Jane Cornwell1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnnette Copeland / Judy Parry vs Janet Neel / Sarah Koenen6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TWILIGHT - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.31
Paige Burns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.22
Vicki Becker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Mandy Rivera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Charlotte McCormick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.15
Christina McCann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.01
Judy Parry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.00
Carisa Spangler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
1.99
Annette Copeland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vicki Becker + Mandy Rivera4350% games+6.6% vs expected
Vicki Becker + Charlotte McCormick4845% games+3.7% vs expected
Annette Copeland + Paige Burns2544% games−3.7% vs expected
Judy Parry + Annette Copeland3442% games−4.7% vs expected
Judy Parry + Paige Burns1533% games−12.7% vs expected
Judy Parry + Mandy Rivera224 matchesnot enough data
Annette Copeland + Mandy Rivera134 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Rivera + Charlotte McCormick044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paige Burns
4W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Vicki Becker
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Mandy Rivera
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Charlotte McCormick
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Christina McCann
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Judy Parry
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
2.5
Carisa Spangler
4W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Annette Copeland
9W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.