Teams

Toboyek Team

2022 WI Other · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 8.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-12-04vs Abhold TeamWon 20
W#1 DoublesTodd Hammond / Patty Fronberry vs Micky Abhold / Ken Redman8-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Charlotte Toboyek vs Marina Melberg / Michael Finnegan8-5
2022-12-04vs Abhold TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Hardacre / David Gahagan vs Marina Melberg / Michael Finnegan8-3
W#2 DoublesPatty Fronberry / John Park vs Micky Abhold / Ken Redman8-4
W#3 DoublesCharlotte Toboyek / Todd Hammond vs Candace Walz / Michael Tobin8-5
2022-12-04vs Abhold TeamWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Toboyek / John Park vs Micky Abhold / Michael Finnegan8-4
W#2 DoublesSarah Hardacre / Todd Hammond vs Marina Melberg / Ken Redman8-2
W#3 DoublesPatty Fronberry / David Gahagan vs Candace Walz / Michael Tobin8-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 8.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Toboyek Team3090030
2Abhold Team0309972

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Charlotte Toboyek
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Patty Fronberry
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.27
David Gahagan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Todd Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sarah Hardacre
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Gahagan + Todd Hammond2549% games−1.7% vs expected
Sarah Hardacre + Charlotte Toboyek033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlotte Toboyek
113W–51L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Patty Fronberry
27W–21L career · type S · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
3.5
David Gahagan
75W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Todd Hammond
54W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sarah Hardacre
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.