Teams

Schweigert - PCC

2024 Escambia Trilevel 18 & Over · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.57 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-15vs Wilson - RS HardLost 01
L#1 DoublesMandy Blair / Dawn Marino vs Michelle Telhiard / Abigail Nelson3-6, 4-6
2024-10-01vs Escambia/Tan/TriLevel4.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesNatalie Mcelhany / Dawn Marino vs Cherie Krohn / Shannon Schluter2-6, 1-6
2024-09-24vs Bryan - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Catherine Harper / Dawn Marino vs Donna Madison / Tracey Mcclurd6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-23vs Manziek - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJena Wise / Mandy Blair vs Vicki Carson / Theresa Smith6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-03vs Wilson - RS HardLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenee Bradford / Mary Catherine Harper vs Michelle Telhiard / Abigail Nelson5-7, 3-6
2024-08-27vs Escambia/Tan/TriLevel4.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesJena Wise / Carly Russell vs Jessica Schultheis / KIMBERLY ANDREWS7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
3.76
Renee Bradford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Carly Russell
published 4
3.63
Lisa Andresen
published
3.57
Denise Prindiville
published 3.5
3.53
Natalie Mcelhany
published
3.52
Dawn Marino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Jena Wise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Valerie Wilson
published
Ansli Brown
published 3.5
April Schweigert
published 3.5
Cait Gross
published 3.5
3.23
Sandra Wilson
published
2.60
Christin Mathis
published 3
Emily Ioakim
published
Mandy Blair
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jena Wise + Renee Bradford033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Catherine Harper
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
Renee Bradford
134W–162L career · 1 line in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
4
Carly Russell
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Andresen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Denise Prindiville
12W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.57
Natalie Mcelhany
28W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
4
Dawn Marino
69W–110L career · 8 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jena Wise
38W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Valerie Wilson
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Ansli Brown
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
April Schweigert
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Cait Gross
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Wilson
17W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Christin Mathis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Emily Ioakim
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mandy Blair
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.