Teams

FD 6.0 CC Lombardo

2026 NEOTA Fusion Doubles · NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for NEOTA 18&O 6.0 Fusion Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Venkatraman Arakoni
published
2.98
Alamelu Arakoni
published 3
2.85
Stephanie Mabee
published
2.83
Tisha Bell
published
2.79
Manthan Shah
published
2.73
Melissa Meisenbach
published
2.71
Ann Cleminson
published 3
2.68
David Lombardo
published 3
2.63
Puranjay Samantaray
published
2.59
Iuliana Grosescu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tisha Bell + Ann Cleminson8358% games+6.3% vs expected
Stephanie Mabee + Alamelu Arakoni3355% games+6.3% vs expected
Alamelu Arakoni + Tisha Bell1643% games+1.0% vs expected
Melissa Meisenbach + Alamelu Arakoni7254% games−0.8% vs expected
Stephanie Mabee + Tisha Bell4151% gamesnot enough data
Alamelu Arakoni + Iuliana Grosescu3256% gamesnot enough data
Alamelu Arakoni + Ann Cleminson123 matchesnot enough data
Tisha Bell + Iuliana Grosescu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Venkatraman Arakoni
77W–61L career · no lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.30
3
Alamelu Arakoni
127W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Stephanie Mabee
78W–83L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Tisha Bell
103W–90L career · no lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.83
Manthan Shah
14W–15L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Melissa Meisenbach
130W–112L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.73
3
Ann Cleminson
39W–29L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
3
David Lombardo
30W–70L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Puranjay Samantaray
18W–33L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Iuliana Grosescu
48W–40L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.