Teams

Western: Drop Shot Divas

2026 18&Over Women · 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.17 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-25vs PerryWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathleen Hundley / Dominique Canale vs Ali Krowiak / Justine Ledesma6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesEmily Esther vs Vivian Zayas6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-18vs PerryLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Nguyen / Yelena Reporyeva vs Alexa Perry / Jessica Schlosser6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrooke Tutor vs Brianna Laureti5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Hundley / Jennifer Sweet vs Vivian Zayas / Ali Krowiak6-0, 6-1
2026-07-11vs PerryLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Nguyen / Paulette Weinheimer vs Jennifer Gavilondo / Alexa Perry2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesDominique Canale vs Brianna Laureti5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesYelena Reporyeva / Jennifer Sweet vs Justine Ledesma / Ali Krowiak6-1, 6-1
2026-06-27vs PerryWon 21
W#1 DoublesMia Hayes / Adelie Wilson vs Lizzie Barlow / Justine Ledesma6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesEmily Esther vs Brianna Laureti4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLesley Grants / Tara Breen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-14vs PerryWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrooke Tutor / Grace Coyne vs Kuniko Okada / Alex Vizgaitis7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElizaveta Letoshko vs Vivian Zayas6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKatelyn Nguyen / Adelie Wilson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-30vs PerryWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Esther / Kathleen Hundley vs Lizzie Barlow / Jennifer Gavilondo6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesElizaveta Letoshko vs Justine Ledesma6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYelena Reporyeva / Grace Coyne vs Vivian Zayas / Kuniko Okada6-3, 6-1
2026-05-16vs PerryLost 12
L#1 DoublesLesley Grants / Tara Breen vs Alexa Perry / Jessica Schlosser4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMia Hayes vs Brianna Laureti5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKatelyn Nguyen / Dominique Canale vs Kuniko Okada / Ali Krowiak6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Kathleen Hundley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.24
Lesley Grants
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Grace Coyne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.22
Mia Hayes
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Elizaveta Letoshko
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Virginia Crandall
published 4.5
4.07
Adelie Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
4.04
Yelena Reporyeva
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.02
Jennifer Sweet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Katelyn Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 4
3.87
Dominique Canale
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.83
Brooke Tutor
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.81
Emily Esther
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4
3.77
Paulette Weinheimer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Julia Holtermann
published
Tara Breen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yelena Reporyeva + Jennifer Sweet18170% games+8.9% vs expected
Dominique Canale + Katelyn Nguyen7165% games+7.4% vs expected
Paulette Weinheimer + Emily Esther7555% games+3.9% vs expected
Mia Hayes + Emily Esther5259% games+3.7% vs expected
Yelena Reporyeva + Emily Esther5258% games+3.2% vs expected
Paulette Weinheimer + Yelena Reporyeva4354% games−7.1% vs expected
Mia Hayes + Kathleen Hundley134 matchesnot enough data
Tara Breen + Lesley Grants123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Hundley
40W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
Lesley Grants
54W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Grace Coyne
19W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Mia Hayes
35W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Elizaveta Letoshko
26W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Virginia Crandall
78W–73L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Adelie Wilson
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
4.07
4
Yelena Reporyeva
158W–80L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
Jennifer Sweet
46W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Katelyn Nguyen
85W–57L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Dominique Canale
23W–15L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Brooke Tutor
41W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Emily Esther
76W–80L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Paulette Weinheimer
70W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Julia Holtermann
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tara Breen
18W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.