Teams

OC Seal Beach TC - Hao - Sun2

OC Fall Team Singles · OC 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-14vs OC Los Cab - StephanLost 01
L#2 SinglesHao Darren Fang vs Stephane Phan6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-12-13vs OC LLW Palisades- AlanWon 21
L#1 SinglesRyan Huynh vs Darren Chuang0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHao Darren Fang vs Alan Roof4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesWilliam King vs Michael McGee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesParker Braverman vs Jesse Huang6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTaira Asakura vs Andrew Medrano6-4, 6-3
2025-11-09vs OC Lifetime RSC - Darin - Sun3Won 10
W#2 SinglesTaira Asakura vs Jeffrey Wagner6-2, 6-1
2025-11-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesTaira Asakura vs Peter Nguyen6-1, 6-1
2025-10-26Lost 02
L#1 SinglesWilliam King vs Thanh Nguyen3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesParker Braverman vs Khanh Nguyen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-12vs OC LLW Palisades- AlanWon 20
W#1 SinglesWilliam King vs Alan Roof7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesHao Darren Fang vs Jeffrey Fracalosy6-2, 6-2
2025-10-04vs OC Lifetime RSC - Darin - Sun3Won 20
W#1 SinglesHao Darren Fang vs Christopher Redburn6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesParker Braverman vs Darin Kawamoto7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTaira Asakura vs DANIEL KIRKPATRICK5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesParker Braverman vs Andrew Medrano3-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Huynh vs Bryan Chou4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Avery Wang
published 4.5
3.97
Danh Nguyen
published 4.5
3.89
Hao Darren Fang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 4
3.88
Taira Asakura
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.85
William King
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.81
Ryan Huynh
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Parker Braverman
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Avery Wang
3W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Danh Nguyen
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
Hao Darren Fang
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Taira Asakura
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.88
William King
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
3.85
Ryan Huynh
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Parker Braverman
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.